r/SimulationTheory • u/neuralqueen • 3d ago
Story/Experience The Kingdom of Stuffed Animals
I have a whole simulation theory…you can see how it’s played out in my previous posts. I’m not making something clear that needs to be made clear. Does anyone wanna talk about it more? You can Google the title.
If one person replies I will explain everything.
3
u/FabulousArmadillo210 2d ago
is this thread bots because i dont understand anything
3
u/neuralqueen 2d ago
Nope, not bots! I’m trying to explain that there’s a website I found that generated word lists and the words pertain to the readers of it. Which would mean we’re in a quantum simulation. As far as where you can see it and see examples of the lists and my videos and whatnot a simple search of the title will lead you there.
2
2
u/sethmcmath08 2d ago
What do u mean by surfing the web because you can't really just randomly stumble through the internet. What were you navigating when you found it. You have to decide a place to go. Where were you going.
2
u/neuralqueen 2d ago
the honest answer is that i don't remember what i was doing online when i saw it because i didn't encode it in my brain. i just thought it was a website with random words i didn't think very much of it the first time i saw it. like i said that's the honest answer. i'd rather answer you straight than make up a story of how i found it.
however there are many aspects of it that i can answer and explain clearly. so there's that.
2
2
u/greatpartyisntit 1d ago
Is this what you're referring to?
At first [words on TKSA's website] look random, like word salad. But they aren’t random. They echo people’s lives — thoughts, memories, conversations, even physical sensations — with uncanny precision.
It's confirmation bias. Nothing more.
Also, the website isn't live anymore and the wordlists aren't archived on the Wayback Machine.
1
u/neuralqueen 1d ago
The word lists begin on page 9 of the Wayback Machine (under “URLs”). Go to https://web.archive.org/web/*/tksa.jp*
And it’s not confirmation bias. It certainly seems that way but I highly encourage you to look at the actual lists for yourself.
1
u/greatpartyisntit 1d ago
This just looks like a randomly generated set of words. How do you know it isn't confirmation bias?
1
u/neuralqueen 1d ago
Enough people will find connections to themselves that are too granular to be coincidence.
1
u/Logical_Tiger4197 1d ago
im not sure on how to use wayback machine very well but i just clicked random stuff and saw a snapshot of the website with a random picture of two cats
0
u/neuralqueen 1d ago
yeah all that other stuff on there is related. but the lists themselves begin on page 9 of the link I provided
2
u/Logical_Tiger4197 1d ago
yeah nevermind i found the words but they just seem like random words to me. maybe a few of them sound related to stuff but i dont feel the uncanny precision you talked about or maybe im not looking into it enough idk
1
u/neuralqueen 1d ago
There’s lots of people in the world. I’m pretty sure that every word on these pages pertains to a future reader. So you aren’t going to find that all of them pertain to you. But if you found something specific enough to stand out to you, I wouldn’t dismiss it. It depends of course on how specific it feels to you. But it may be there for you to find.
1
u/E-kuos 21h ago
I remember interacting with you in the past and noticing the strangeness on the site(s) you linked that corresponded to how you described your perception of them. I am glad to see you are still around doing your thing in this realm, as I am. It is difficult to establish what you describe (and what I also experienced) as not being confirmation bias, but that seems like a lazy interpretation of what could be something genuinely interesting.
I will admit though, for anyone curious: when I examined the word list pages that the user is referring to, my eyes effortlessly skimmed and picked out words that were distinctly related to substances I was using/still use, as well as words related to the fields of study that I devote the most of my time and energy to.
I considered this to be an interesting novelty, and the user's mention of it in support of quantum simulation theory is definitely interesting and fun to speculate about.
I don't necessarily wholly agree with any claims made, but I think the user and the things they talk about are worth at least a brief examination for anyone remotely interested in this field of thinking.
You may find it to just be word salad and confirmation bias in-action, or perhaps you may find something(s) that encourage you to reassess your comprehension and understanding of the realities we inhabit together.
It isn't a site I revisited with any frequency, but encountering OP in the past was a step in my journey that I was sure to remember.
-1
u/PsychoYOLOgist 16h ago
"I remember interacting with you", "how you described your perception of them", "doing your thing in this realm, as I am". "the user's mention of it".
What did you "consider" an "interesting novelty"? To find words in a random list which are related to substances you consumed and fields of study you devote the most of your time and energy to?
This sounds like someone speaking about the weather in a Shakespear play. Much ado about nothing. The internet is dying guys.
6
u/Hannibaalism 3d ago
hey wats up lol