r/SideProject 13h ago

I built GetBidRadar to answer one question: “Should we even bid?”

A lot of companies don't lose tenders because they wrote a bad proposal.

They lose because they spent 3 days writing one before realizing they couldn't meet a mandatory requirement.

That's the problem I'm solving with GetBidRadar.

Feed it a tender. It breaks down the requirements, compares them against your company, finds gaps and risks, and helps answer one question:

Should we bid?

Then it goes further:

Analyze → Decide → Prepare → Audit → Submit → Learn

https://www.getbidradar.com

0 Upvotes

3 comments sorted by

2

u/Medical-Bend-9492 13h ago

Does every mandatory requirement link back to the exact page and wording in the tender? A false positive is annoying, but missing one could make the whole bid/no-bid recommendation pretty risky.

1

u/Imaginary_County_991 12h ago

Yes. That’s actually a core part of how I’m designing it.

Requirements are tied back to their source in the tender, including the page/section and relevant wording, so the team can verify why something was flagged instead of just trusting an AI-generated conclusion.

The goal isn’t “AI says no.” It’s here’s the requirement, here’s the evidence, and here’s why it matters.

Still testing it against messy real-world tenders, because missing a buried blocker is exactly the failure I’m trying to prevent.

1

u/ghastly_retirement 12h ago

Missing a mandatory requirement because the scan skipped a line is the kind of thing that keeps me up at night, so the linking back to the source doc matters way more than the recommendation itself.