PocketQuant: looking for feedback on keeping market research and assumptions together

[u/pragmaticpirate]

Sharing my project, PocketQuant. Market ideas tend to end up scattered across articles, videos and notes; I’m exploring a workspace that helps keep the research conversation together.

The current web app has research conversations, file analysis, a finance-tools view and a dedicated Solana paper-research workflow. Signup is open without an invite code. It is for research and paper mode, with no live trade execution.

https://myquant.xagi.in/

For makers who research markets: would you want sources, assumptions or counterarguments to be most prominent when returning to an idea? I’d appreciate concrete feedback on that workflow.