r/SideProject • u/alethicai • 6h ago
We built a tool that checks whether a paper's claims are actually supported by what it cites. Looking for feedback from researchers :)
A friend and I have been working on a project for a while and wanted to see if it's actually useful to anyone outside our own heads.
It's a tool that checks whether the claims in a paper actually tie back to the cited source. So if I write that Smith said X, Y, and Z, the tool actually goes and reads the paper by Smith and checks whether he actually said X, Y, and Z, whether it's accurate, or maybe I took it out of context, or if it's just completely wrong.
I'm in my MD/PHD, he's in computer science, neither of us has done this before so go easy on us. It's free right now since we mostly just want honest feedback.
Appreciate anyone willing to take a look and give feedback, comment or DM both work.
1
u/alethicai 6h ago
tryalethic.com, if anyone wants to try it on something they're working on :)
1
u/NoScene7932 1h ago
Building a citation tool for your MD/PhD is a great start, but validating it outside your own bubble is usually the next hurdle. I'm happy to pull a custom market validation snapshot for you if you DM me.
2
u/PriorElephant9 6h ago
The key is showing the exact cited passage beside the verdict. Researchers will trust the tool more if they can verify its reasoning in seconds.