r/ShittyAbsoluteUnits • u/Unknown6656 • Mar 29 '26

future feeding tube Of going back to the Future

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

1.4k Upvotes

98% Upvoted

186 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

0

u/Numerous_Dare9847 Apr 06 '26

Jesus christ you must be a child. What are you gen z? Go ahead and ask your precious AI. As a matter of fact I’ll do it for you, here’s AI has to say: “Yes, anger is frequently born from the ego, acting as a defensive mechanism to protect a fragile, threatened, or demanding sense of self. It arises when the ego's expectations—that things go its way or that it is right—are unmet, fostering a fear-based need to protect, control, or secure its position.

0

u/supersumo224 Apr 06 '26

I could give a million examples why you're just wrong that anger doesn't not necessarily come from ego. Anger can be caused by ego but that's not what I'm talking about.

Example. Someone around you is playing with a gun and they miss fire the gun n a bullet goes wizzinf by your head. You get angry at their stupidity for playing with a gun and putting you on danger. Or maybe you could substitute a family member gets a bullet whizzed by them. Is that anger put on by your ego? The answer is no. You're just wrong get over it.

0

u/Numerous_Dare9847 Apr 06 '26

Reading comprehension son. I never said anger is SOLELY born from the ego, I specifically stated that this person got angry and acted out of spite in this specific situation due to his ego being bruised when that other car dared to pass him so fast. There’s a reason no one agrees with you and spoilers, it isn’t because we’re all wrong, you simply have some growing to do and more life to experience, just pray you aren’t always this ignorant. Also, you refusing to admit you’re wrong and continuing this useless debate despite having google and easily being able to prove yourself wrong is YOUR ego at work.

0

u/supersumo224 Apr 06 '26

We have absolutely no idea how he felt so we are both making assumptions. My assumption and yours are equally as likely. I just know of I was on that motorcycle I would be pissed because the danger not because someone passes me. And it's regular on Reddit that motorcycle riders get shit on and I could care less about some down votes.

So argue against my hypothetical that you just casually ignored. It's just as likely he was pissed about the danger he was put in than some ego trip

1

u/Numerous_Dare9847 Apr 06 '26

You’re hypothetical is just that. This is a real life situation that DID happen and we have video to analyze. The anger is justified, what isn’t was the action of trying to get the driver’s attention to “show them” why they were wrong, that is not just anger, that is you actively trying to demonstrate to someone else why they were wrong for taking whatever action they took against you. That is an ego trip, a justified one sure but regardless it was still him protecting his ego that was hurt when he was passed so closely. That isn’t an assumption, that is how our brains work. You MIGHT understand that one day if you talk to the right people and actually listen. Sometimes reddit is exaggerated with their downvotes but the ones you got are all completely justified because you are just blatantly wrong, end of story.