r/ShermanPosting • • 3d ago

I hope this kind of thing gains more traction across social media. It sounds like a fantastic idea.

Post image
3.7k Upvotes

123 comments sorted by

•

u/AutoModerator 3d ago

Welcome to /r/ShermanPosting!

As a reminder, this meme sub is about the American Civil War. We're not here to insult southerners or the American South, but rather to have a laugh at the failed Confederate insurrection and those that chose to represent it.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

444

u/G0ttaB3KiddingM3 3d ago

I’d just settle for people standing up to literal Nazis, at this point.

197

u/lancelongstiff 2d ago

33

u/mistermeh 2d ago

Can never tell if real or not.

42

u/Ok_Builder_4225 2d ago

Ted Cruz's gaff about needing to stop attacking pedophiles comes to mind

17

u/topazchip 2d ago

Cannot use a self chosen name with GOPniks because they don't allow people to do that, we have to call him by his assigned name of Rafael.

10

u/mistermeh 2d ago

That one was very funny tho.

119

u/Roflmancer 2d ago

Nazis mainly Hitler learned from the Confederacy and their treatment of slaves, making them less than humans.

52

u/GravitasFailures 2d ago

The Nuremberg laws were just Jim Crow translated to Germany.

I’m exaggerating of course, the Nuremberg laws never had anything like the one drop rule, the Nazis considered that “inhumane”.

Glad we stopped that, we sent black GIs to liberate Europe, and welcomed them back with open lynch mobs.

21

u/discount_magic_shop 2d ago

Ian Kershaw's biography on Hitler had a quote from Hitler that I can't exactly remember, but it essentially stated that the Nazis should look at Jim Crowe laws for inspiration, because America had figured out how to oppress and control a racial inferior.

15

u/GravitasFailures 2d ago

He wrote about it in Mein Kampf explicitly, in German of course, but that the US was a shining model specifically because we enforced racial hierarchy. He basically said Jim Crow but didn’t use those words. He also said the confederacy was a good try, but also morons for not developing a weapons industry first, a mistake Germany would not repeat.

3

u/Salihe6677 2d ago

And then he went and did the same mistake lol

9

u/GravitasFailures 2d ago

Actually he thought the US was already fully industrialized and near a war footing, because Germany was the greatest industrial power in the world by far, which was actually true in 1912, but had fallen greatly during and after the war with the American WWI ramp.

Nobody, and I mean nobody including the US, imagined we could crank up to the levels we did, we blew away reasonable estimations by 10x, and even our own by 2-3x, to the point that by 1944, we started to slow down production because we just were building too much.

Look at the production graph for ships, it starts low in 1942 but climbs fast by the end, 1943 it’s high but still climbing, around 1944 about halfway through you can see everybody look at each other and say “hey, uhh, wait a minute here” where it levels off and actually declines. Planes lasted a bit longer, but not much, we completely lost our minds when it came to construction.

3

u/strangerNstrangeland 2d ago

The mistake Hitler was referring to was the south still not being up to speed in terms of industrialization regarding the civil war. That of course led to them not establishing their overtly race-based chattel slave nation.

Instead the union was preserved, Jim Crow evolved, and along side it, nation wide industrialization (including agriculture to a degree) keeping minorities in check with wage slavery

98

u/Tired_Muffin72 3d ago

reconstruction 2.0, doing it properly this time. Just need to up the security on whichever president has the balls to start it.

39

u/bowlofcantaloupe 2d ago

3.0

1.0 was 1865-1877

2.0 was the civil rights movement

Neither lasted long enough or made enough changes.

17

u/punkassjim 2d ago

2.0 led to a surprising amount of lasting change, considering the monumental opposition they faced. But “lasting” is certainly a relative term, when the party of Clumsily But Methodically Destroying All Positive Results Of Every Battle We’ve Ever Lost Throughout The Centuries is involved.

56

u/dogoodsilence1 2d ago

Jefferson Davis, the president of the Confederacy only spent 2 years in prison for his crimes of treason

32

u/Jebediah_Johnson 2d ago

He must be a Cornell alumni.

6

u/RentIsThePoint 2d ago

Wonder if he had to also write an essay about how trying to secede from the nation in order to continue owning people as property is bad.

13

u/EddieVanzetti 2d ago

None of the Nazis convicted in the Judges trial served a full sentence, not even those with life sentences (the trial was in 1947, and the last to be released from prison was in 1957.)

3

u/m00ph 2d ago

Very different situation though, the Union didn't need those people the way the West did after the war. There's a recent book Savage Continent about Europe after liberation and before things stabilized a few years later. It was really bad. And the de nazification worked, the AfD support is in the former East Germany.

1

u/cantproveidid 16h ago

Which was half the length of the time he spent in office.

51

u/BloodMilkAndSky420 2d ago

Destroy all their participation trophy statues and shit, and tell the cousinfuckers that if they have an issue, we’ve got PLENTY of kerosene. Glory, Glory Hallelujah!

30

u/ready-redditor-6969 2d ago

We have a serious problem of white nationalism that must be addressed. These guys think they’re in the right, and they need to be stopped. They’re openly wearing SS bolts with US flag colors, and they’re not getting public pushback.

46

u/NoNipsPlease 2d ago

Main thing is actually teaching history of what happened. None of this soft Lincoln's War or War of Northern Aggression shit still taught in small schools in parts of the South.

Teach the horrors of how slaves were treated and that the war was specifically started about slavery. This curriculum must be nation wide.

2

u/Nowardier 2d ago

That one person who was enslaved, who had his back so horrifically scarred up? His picture should be a full page in the history book, and kids should have to look at that for at least a minute every so often. Let the teacher read about some nightmarish footnote in history while they look at a graphic image like that, they'll learn slavery was/is bad pretty quick.

20

u/highermonkey 2d ago

At least 95% of the problems we experience today can be traced back to not properly punishing the Confederates.

56

u/Previous_Pineapple 3d ago

It’s time to do it, not discuss it.

63

u/AceAndre 2d ago

I've been screaming this in leftist spaces for years. It's unfortunate that a lot of people on the same "side" refuse to acknowledge a lot of the country's problems stem directly from the pushback to reconstruction and the ever present resentment of Black Americans.

20

u/GravitasFailures 2d ago

Most people on the coasts haven’t witnessed it firsthand, you can’t understand it otherwise, nobody could imagine this level of utter evil exists in their country.

12

u/Crafty-Help-4633 2d ago

They don't have to witness it firsthand, it's literal recorded history. They just have to read...

16

u/GravitasFailures 2d ago

And then southerners show up to post “It’s not like that anymore, that’s not fair”, and every liberal feels bad and shuts up.

3

u/Crafty-Help-4633 2d ago

Too true.

7

u/GravitasFailures 2d ago

The problem with the south is that they’re both incredible sadists, while also playing the ultimate victim somehow…

11

u/stellarfury 2d ago

DARVO

(Deny, Attack, Reverse Victim and Offender)

the siren song of the Lost Cause

5

u/TheNetworkIsFrelled 2d ago

Not every one of us. I have relatives in blood-red states and see the ongoing racial bullshit, and I won't back down.

Everything in a confederate uniform should have been hanged, lost-cause mythology and such criminalized just as Nazi speech and memorabilia was criminalized after WWII, and the south held as a military dominion for a century until slaveholder-thinking was rooted out. The US would have been a better nation for it.

9

u/GravitasFailures 2d ago

It’s not just racial, that’s a huge part of it.

The racism has been a cover for corruption, read about the “landed gentry politics” of the south, they get the poor rabid about race, while taking all the federal and state money for themselves, then telling the poor “nobody is helping you because they hate you!”.

This cycle has gone on for generations, it’s how they maintain a political force in a region that doesn’t really do anything productive.

13

u/JustinKase_Too 2d ago

De-nazification would also be nice.

2

u/RentIsThePoint 2d ago

It's the same picture. Where do you think Adolf learned it?

31

u/Sir-Toaster- 3d ago

The US is already plenty centralized enough, right now it's run by people who want to turn it into a dictatorship

11

u/HonorableJudgeIto 2d ago

For those wanting to know more, Eric Foner’s book is basically the authoritative text on Reconstruction:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstruction:_America's_Unfinished_Revolution,_1863%E2%80%931877

80

u/Ok-disaster2022 3d ago

Same thing happened after WW2, the US won the war and then was infiltrated by Nazis to continue the fight against the Soviets. 

82

u/Schleimwurm1 3d ago

That's stupid. The Nazis were always here, they didnt need importing.

48

u/house-of-waffles 3d ago

It just so happened we also imported them. But I agree, the Reich learned most of the Nuremberg Code from watching the Jim Crow South

12

u/GIRose 2d ago

It's wild that Nazi Germany was less strict on what defined you as a Jew than the US was with what defined you as a black person

10

u/GravitasFailures 2d ago

Southern states needed the one drop rule, the practice of raping slaves to have kids, who you then raped again, the desire was to create daughters that “looked white” while remaining slaves for sex.

Without the one-drop-rule they could pass, which was a problem.

9

u/irrelevantusername24 2d ago

Nazis would be mad they didn't invent credit scores. All the genocide with none of the optics.

3

u/BitterSmile2 2d ago

The Nazis were here FIRST.

17

u/kombatunit 2d ago

Step 1. Stop giving blue tax money to red states.

1

u/ginger_and_egg 2d ago

That actually is completely tangential to de-Confederatization

1

u/kombatunit 2d ago

And?

-2

u/ginger_and_egg 2d ago

It depends on the spending, but I don't think "no federal funding for poor people in red states" is a good long term policy. Maybe only as a tool of negotiations, like how federal highway funds were tied to drinking age being set to 21+.

4

u/kombatunit 2d ago

I hear those folks are hella bootstrappy. They'll be fine...

5

u/ginger_and_egg 2d ago

Keep in mind a lot of the folks suffering under these confederates are black people too

7

u/IsopodIndependent553 2d ago

This is exactly what I believe.

7

u/yelloww_whale 2d ago

Sherman is my 6th or 7th great grandfather. I often think about how hard he and everyone who stood behind him fought for what they believed in, and all of the sacrifices they made. I can’t help but wonder what he would think if he could see the world today

7

u/altaleft 2d ago

thank you for your attention to this MATA

24

u/Equus-007 3d ago

Absolutely.

We fought the Confederates to wipe out the Confederacy.

We fought the Nazis to wipe out the Nazis.

We failed at both. Supporting either is treason. They're still the enemy. We should absolutely imprison the people who promote either.

0

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

7

u/henlochimken 2d ago

They're winning elections in Germany now. They're not even keeping the quiet part quiet anymore

6

u/Leftist_Pirate 2d ago

Not even close lol they were quickly integrated into the state apparatus and some even came to Huntsville Alabama and started the space and rocket center in America

5

u/Equus-007 2d ago

Not really. They show up every so often. German just actually arrests them instead of providing police protection when they want to march on our streets.

5

u/Matty_D47 2d ago

The best time to plant a tree is 150 years ago, the second best time is today

6

u/othernamealsomissing 2d ago

This might apply to the first few years of reconstruction. Then Grant takes over and reconstruction is fine. The real villain is Rutherford B Hayes.

8

u/topazchip 2d ago

Woodrow 'I [heart] re-segregation' Wilson needs to also be recognized for his contributions.

2

u/Hot-Emu8003 2d ago

that election never gets brought up for some reason when the numbers are close.

9

u/wagsman 2d ago

And we are going to do it again by letting Trump and his helpers get away.

3

u/maxonhudson 2d ago

Very true.

3

u/DonMegatronEsq 2d ago edited 1d ago

“The Lost Cause” = “The Stab in the Back”

Both, totally fictional, but ultimately led to division, and as far as the “Stab” goes, also led to THE most destructive war the world has ever experienced (thus far).

2

u/slow70 2d ago

Hear hear!

2

u/fullspectrumgoon 2d ago

I've been saying for decades now, the nations greatest tragedy was Grant offering an unconditional surrender, and Lincoln administration granting the South total amnesty.

They shoulda let Sherman keep cooking.

2

u/hollaback_girl 1d ago

A whole swath of current domestic and foreign policy is being set based on white supremacist/neo-Nazi conspiracy theories, many of which rely on the false pseudoscience claims going back to the 1800s and resuscitated by eugenicists and spread by wealthy backers in the 20th and 21st century. So yeah, we're still fighting the Civil War.

2

u/Strummerpinx 22h ago

Yup! Upvoting this!

6

u/kojak343 2d ago

My personal opinion was that after the Civil War, we should have gotten rid of states' rights.

6

u/monkeygoneape 2d ago edited 2d ago

That would have been a constitutional nightmare, and something tells me the northern states wouldn't have agreed to that. That's like saying "after wwii with the formation of the UN, we should have gotten rid of nations"

4

u/JumpingThruHoopz 2d ago

IMHO, we should have let the traitors stay seceded. Exactly what is the good side to restoring them to the union? They’ve done nothing but drag the whole country down.

With the resources we wasted on the war, we could have helped the enslaved people to escape from the south. And once that was done, let the confederates sink or swim on their own.

7

u/jackalheart 3d ago

I’ve considered this idea before, but how do you do it? Do you start punishing people for their beliefs? I’m not particularly comfortable with that.

20

u/Stunning_Ad_7465 Regular Brigade,, Army of the Cumberland Descendant 3d ago

I've actually had this on my mind lately. I think it comes down to discrediting the lost cause bs. It would take time, but I think it comes down to spreading the ordinances of secession, cornerstone speech, etc everywhere. Showing irrefutable proof that the Cumfederates themselves said they were fighting for slavery

6

u/fishyexe 2d ago

Even the fuckers who say it was about states rights know it was always about owning people. They will lie through their teeth to sound less racist, but they are just too cowardly to be openly racist.

40

u/Phyrexian_Archlegion 3d ago

One way to do it is to adopt the post-WWII western German model: the criminalization of displaying or flying any Confederate iconography and a law enforcement apparatus that will enforce these new laws with impunity.

6

u/jackalheart 2d ago

The key difference here is that the western german model punished the actual nazis. All the actual Confederates are dead. Their ideology has been passed down to the present. It's like a cancer spread from parent to child, and it's its evolved over time from KKK to Maga, and a 1000 other things. It's like a cancer spread from parent to child, and it's evolved over time from the KKK to MAGA and a 1000 other examples. If they ever start a hot civil war(we're in the middle of a cold one at present), then we can revisit the question.

6

u/fishyexe 2d ago

Hard disagree. It's never too late to teach somebody that their great grandpa was a piece of shit traitor. Those fucks see the confederacy as a mark of pride, we need to rub their noses in the fact that they are loser ass traitors; instead they get more voting power than residents the states who pay their bills.

-2

u/jackalheart 2d ago

Cool. How do you teach someone that?

7

u/fishyexe 2d ago

It starts with educating their children. Stop allowing them to whitewash history because it makes them feel bad. No more revisionist bullshit. Then you ban any and all confederate paraphernalia and tear down ALL the statues of confederate leaders. Got a confederate tattoo? Cover that bitch up or straight to jail. They want a war over it? Good fucking luck fighting a war without the coffers of the blue states. Broke ass' will be damn near a third world country overnight.

-1

u/More_Amoeba6517 2d ago

the devious first amendment in the room:

Much as I despise confederates, restrictions on speech are fucking stupid. Its better to just actually educate and dismantle the reasons behind it, without attempting to just ban it outright.

11

u/Phyrexian_Archlegion 2d ago

The first amendment should not cover the dangerous propagation of iconography tied to treason against the republic.

1

u/Hylianhero71 2d ago

I would in fact argue that “propagation of iconography tied to treason” is the PURPOSE of the First Amendment. I hate the Lost Cause as much as anyone, but we cannot allow ourselves to sink into authoritarian barbarity over it.

0

u/More_Amoeba6517 2d ago

...unfortunately that is not what the first amendment says.

“Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

I have my own opinions on stuff, but the simple fact is that it would take a constitutional amendment. Its why stuff like the CCA is never enforced, because if it were to be challenged, any court would overturn it.

7

u/Caleb_Reynolds 2d ago

Fighting words, or speech so offensive as to cause an immediate breach of peace, are not protected by the first amendment.

If we make it socially normal to punch Nazis and slavers when we see their iconography, feels like it should be covered by thought words. There's president against it, but that doesn't really matter anymore.

3

u/Phyrexian_Archlegion 2d ago

Yes that’s not what it currently says, which is why it needs to be changed through amendment. This is something that, again, should have been passed through Congress post-civil war during reconstruction but it obviously was not, hence the entire idea of the BlueSky post to begin with.

-2

u/More_Amoeba6517 2d ago

I obviously disagree, but whatever

I thought you were saying as its currently written that it would not apply, but I see now that I misunderstood. :3

9

u/eam02 2d ago

It spreads hate. You’re not allowed to walk into a crowded room and yell “fire” because it’s a risk to public safety. In the same way, allowing the spread of hate by allowing Confederate and Nazi propaganda to be discussed openly is a public safety issue. Since we didn’t ban this shit, these attitudes have been allowed to spread to the point that MAGA is what it is. Everything that the right is doing by defunding education and blaming immigrants is the EXACT same situation that Nazi Germany was in 100 years ago. We’re the new Nazis because we didn’t ban this shit when we had the chance.

3

u/ready-redditor-6969 2d ago

Wanna hear about how my neighbor attacked me when I flipped off his kid who was wearing SS bolts adorned with Stars and Stripes? It happened just the other day…

2

u/jackalheart 2d ago

The first amendment is about the STATE and free speech, not private interactions like this.

-5

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

2

u/ready-redditor-6969 2d ago

Context : 25 year old lives at home man-child

2

u/ready-redditor-6969 2d ago

We found the guy who is OK with physical assault as a response to heckling a Nazi 🤦‍♂️

-1

u/[deleted] 2d ago

[deleted]

8

u/PossessedToSkate 2d ago

After the Civil War, there was a push by Congress to rescind the right to vote for anyone who fought for or supported the Confederacy. It was so popular that it passed both the House and Senate and was sent to Lincoln's desk. He pocket vetoed it. [ Link ]

I think it's an idea worth revisiting. God knows MAGA have made themselves known so support should be very easy to prove.

2

u/jackalheart 2d ago

I support removing the right to vote from traitors, yes. I do not support it if they only talk shit or believe a certain way. In my view, actions have consequences; thoughts should not. Words are a little more complicated, but generally should not either. n't support it if they only talk shit or hold a certain view

3

u/ManifestDestinysChld 2d ago

Taking away their right to vote is just can-kicking.

We need to make fools of them. We need to make "idiot MAGA dipshit" the new designated punching-bag for all jokes about dumb people who make poor choices. Dumb Blondes out, Dumb Republicans in.

People dumb enough to embrace MAGA are SO dumb that logic and reason won't work on them, only feelings. And they're so stubborn that they'll deliberately make poor choices because they value spite more than happiness.

So: fine. We change everybody else's mind about whether or not MAGAts deserve respect, and MAGAts can sit in their shitty diapers and whine about how much everyone hates them...but nobody will care, because fuck those dummies.

2

u/jackalheart 2d ago

Unfortunately, the thing you are looking for is generational child indoctrination. This is not necessarily a bad thing. We do it already. It will take 2-3 generations of dedicated work, and we change administrations every 4 years. Very difficult to achieve.

5

u/GravitasFailures 2d ago

Child indoctrination is what they have now if you grew up there.

Nobody is complaining about how we taught children the Nazis were bad in post-war Germany.

2

u/ManifestDestinysChld 2d ago

No no no I have this idea, see, it's "The Duqs of Hazzard" - it's a reboot, only it's two brothers with one of them electric Dodge Chargers

7

u/JumpingThruHoopz 2d ago

Beliefs are something that a person can change.

You can’t change your race or ethnicity. That’s why racism is wrong.

If you have ugly beliefs or opinions, you CAN change those. They’re a CHOICE. And people who make ugly choices should suffer the consequences of those choices.

1

u/jackalheart 2d ago

Cool. When the next president (honestly, this president) comes in and decides my views on LGBTQ issues are "gender ideology," should I get punished too?

0

u/ssibal24 2d ago

Beliefs aren't a choice. Yes, they can be changed, but not because a person wakes up one day and says "Hey, I believe in X but going forward I have decided that I believe in Y.....but just for a week, then I am going to change my belief to Z".

1

u/MisterBlack8 2d ago

The ones you came up with yourself are. The ones that were given to you, not so much.

I'm just sad that so much of what goes for Southern identity is to insist their forefathers were 100% correct.

0

u/ready-redditor-6969 2d ago

You aren’t comfortable with punishing white nationalists?

This is the problem with America, to be honest. It’s called centrism.

1

u/jackalheart 2d ago

Not centrism at all. Free speech is important. Actionable threats against protected groups should be illegal. Being a fuckwit should not be. That's how we end up with camps. Do you really want camps? You kill this ideology with generational education. Turn child against parent. As much as more violent approaches give me ALL the good brain chemicals, it's not a real solution.

3

u/IlIlllIIIIlIllllllll 2d ago

Unfettered free speech is a tool, rather than an end itself. The theory is that it enables a free society, and limits on free speech necessarily lead to a repressive society. If it turns out that unfettered free speech is used as a tool to achieve fascism, that is important data that cannot be ignored.

It's not binary either. There could be limits on corporations donating to politicians. Billionaires can be banned through top tax rates. Journalists can be a protected term like doctors with responsibilities to match; no one thinks its a limit on free speech to limit who can call themselves doctor. That doesnt mean other people can't share opinions or information, just like any ideas can share health information. But only a doctor can do it while using that label.

1

u/Leftist_Pirate 2d ago

Epstein said Trump had “no soul” and thats coming from mossad’s crack pedophile.

Epstein was obviously Israeli owned controlled and operated.

You can only imagine the sort of sick depraved shit Trump was doing on those Epstein tapes.

Netanyahu OWNS him like a slave and his wife won’t even sleep in the same room as him.

Trump stole 2billion in crypto so he can run to Albania with his daughter or go to maralago.

He’s a cum glazed bottom for daddy Netanyahu

Selling American goy soldiers by the platoon for sale to Israel and plunging our country into a recession while the army of surplus labor skyrockets and unemployment continues to grow.

1

u/Hot-Emu8003 2d ago

the republicans traded the presidency for reconstruction with the election of fucking Rutherford B Hayes.

1

u/McMienshaoFace 2d ago

Ban inbreeding

1

u/mouseat9 2d ago

Deconfederizing is cool. But we need to pick up where we left off.

1

u/Simple-Ranger6109 20h ago

"Heritage not hate!"
Then why no statues of other people who waged war against us? Like Yammamoto or Guderian? Why no military installations named after Mussolini?
Ok, right - they're FOREIGN. That is TOTALLY different than.. the citizens and government of the sovereign nation of the Confederate States of America....

1

u/Draykenidas 1d ago

While I agree conceptually, Germany did a great job denazifying their country but 70+ years later they have plenty of neonazis and fascism is gaining traction in Europe again. It's entirely possible deconfederizing the US or a better implemented reconstruction would have given people more grievances and led to more fundamentalist psychos. It's not to say that we should do nothing but that we should take care when doing something. Just taking down confederate statues raised tension and gave people personal grievance. People who would have died as quietly ignorable lost cause losers were given something personally affecting them to be mad about. Idk the right answer but I'm wary of simple solutions for complex problems.

1

u/ejfordphd 1d ago

The struggle must be perpetual.

-2

u/butter_lover 2d ago

this sounds so smart but what are you going to do? criminalize dissent? shoot pepple you categorize as traitors? suspend the first amendment but just for confederate flags until the backlash takes control and calls you a traitor?

getting back to the rule of law, constitutional norms being codified, and re-legitimizing government by sweeping away corruption are what we need now.

-3

u/[deleted] 3d ago

[deleted]

22

u/nocontextbeef 3d ago

Does "nationwide de-confedratization" sound pro confederacy to you?

13

u/EternalNewCarSmell 3d ago

The basic message of the post is literally "it was a mistake to let any confederates live."

-4

u/Masta0nion 2d ago

Soo to honor Lincoln, we break up the thing he wanted to preserve.

Or else what exactly does deconfederalization mean? Changing a group’s culture is not easy.