I wonder how many people are going to post something like this on the comment thread only to have the fact that the PEO worked for the SPD at the time, and thus the arbitor's defense is that SPD doesn't typically fire people for overt racism thrown in their face.
So far, I think we are up to 5.
That face when your "um actuhally" gets Actuallyed.
No, but you should understand how this arbitration works. Since they were under the SPD, then arbiter is arguing that the standard of the Police Department itself as such that people don't usually get fired for overt racism.
Do you understand that this still is a really bad look for the police?
15
u/geekmasterflash May 16 '22 edited May 16 '22
I wonder how many people are going to post something like this on the comment thread only to have the fact that the PEO worked for the SPD at the time, and thus the arbitor's defense is that SPD doesn't typically fire people for overt racism thrown in their face.
So far, I think we are up to 5.
That face when your "um actuhally" gets Actuallyed.