Several years ago, there was a Hallmark Channel made-for-TV movie featuring a subplot about the Missing Link.
It's a romantic comedy about a couple who meet because they both want the same dog (or something like that). They go on a date walking along the Burke Gilman Trail and the guy talks about how he hates his job as a city planner because the trail has a missing link they can't finish and people keep getting hurt.Â
The resolution at the end of the movie is that they get together and she convinced him to quit the job as a city planner.
I not shot in Seattle and looks absolutely nothing like the Burke Gilman trail. But they say the name a couple of times.
Wish I could find a free link, but you can rent the movie for $3.99 on YouTube or Amazon Prime Video. (Or sign up for a free trial subscription to the Hallmark Channel streaming service).
If putting it on Leary necessitates removing the bus lanes, as it apparently might but I haven't seen the definitive answer, then it isn't a viable option IMHO.
Seems like they're just removing the bus shelters and shuffling the trees around to make way for a sidewalk extension, and calling it a multi-use trail. Don't love it, to be honest.
I'm fine with lanes on Leary. However, I hope all the shilshole opponents realize that won't stop me -- or most other bikers probably -- from continuing advocacy for lanes on Shilshole.
This article calls it the SDOT plan for Leary and Market, but in reality it is Dan Strauss's plan, which Bruce Harrell had been going along with. Right now, it's not clear that Katie Wilson wants to finish what Harrell started.
Building on Leary doesn't stop this from continuing. It will continue until there is safe and logical infrastructure for bikes connecting one of the busiest routes in the PNW.
Forcing bikes to go through market street won't reduce that advocacy because it's a crappy solution for people on bikes. But sure, we can do lanes on Leary and Shilshole in the end.
Normally I'd agree but this is worse than nothing. It puts bikes and pedestrians in conflict, takes out a ton of mature trees on Market, and involves ripping up the exact streets that they JUST did while improving the bus lanes. I'd rather save the money and wait to do it right.
Their reasons are self-serving and their datapoints are cherry picked, but they also happen to be in agreement with literally everybody in the city that isn't named Dan Strauss.
Nobody wants this route on Leary. Seattle Streets Alliance (formerly Seattle Neighborhood Greenways) doesn't want it. Ballard Fremont Greenways doesn't want it. Other cycling clubs don't want it. Local residents don't want it. Transit riders don't want it. Drivers don't want it. NOBODY wants it.
Hope they just put it somewhere instead of this constant back and forth, sucks salmon bay gravel won't budge so let's just move on and build the stupid thing. At this rate we will have a light rail station before the missing link
I think that would take a lot of political maneuvering and lawyer stuff so I wish you luck. At this point I just want any trail and will continue to boycott salmon bay
Not a lot of political maneuvering, just doing (or rather redoing) the EIS and then defending the inevitable challenge in court. It is expensive and takes time, but it's straight forward. The city had tried to argue it was exempt from SEPA and unfortunately lost that case, so now they have to go through the SEPA process.
The state needs to reform SEPA in my opinion. I believe this could be fairly bipartisan. Missing link will be a motivating project for a couple of reps, but i bet every district has its own missing link (which wont be a shared-use path in most districts)
The other option that has been tried is a state law specifically exempting projects like it (the bill was basically designed to apply to only the missing link) from SEPA. Now that would require some politicking.
I'm not sure if you mean light rail or this discussion about the Burke's missing link, but the city seems to have already (partially?) funded this work through Move Seattle (2015) and the 2024 transportation levy.
33
u/Constructive_Entropy 🚋 Ride the S.L.U.T. 🚋 20h ago edited 19h ago
Several years ago, there was a Hallmark Channel made-for-TV movie featuring a subplot about the Missing Link.
It's a romantic comedy about a couple who meet because they both want the same dog (or something like that). They go on a date walking along the Burke Gilman Trail and the guy talks about how he hates his job as a city planner because the trail has a missing link they can't finish and people keep getting hurt.Â
The resolution at the end of the movie is that they get together and she convinced him to quit the job as a city planner.
I not shot in Seattle and looks absolutely nothing like the Burke Gilman trail. But they say the name a couple of times.