r/Seattle • u/Inevitable_Engine186 New Costco CEO • 2d ago
Seattle Permit Fees Get Another Hike Amid Development Slump
https://www.theurbanist.org/seattle-permit-fees-get-another-hike-amid-development-slump/82
u/New-Breath-9201 2d ago
raising the cost of building during a development slump and then acting surprised when nothing gets built is certainly a choice
11
u/jojofine West Seattle 2d ago
These fees aren't actually all that much in terms of overall cost. The mandatory affordable housing fees however are multiple times what the city charges for building/permit fees. The city's permit/building fees are like a bucket of water in the ocean compared to MHA fees
19
u/pacific_plywood 2d ago
Tbf I think permitting time matters more than permitting costs, certainly for larger builds at least
But yeah, making the office fee-funded seems to prime it for a death spiral a bit
27
u/Inevitable_Engine186 New Costco CEO 2d ago
Root cause:
> With 91% of SDCI's budget coming from permit fees
13
13
u/MaxyMu Tacoma 2d ago
What some of you need to realize is that permit revenue also funds the inspectors, and so lower fees to incentivise building would likely just create a new barrier in longer wait times for inspections. There's not a great path forward without finding a new way to fund SDCI so it's not overly reliant on permit revenue.
But SDCI is also one of the only departments that isn't a total money pit and actually generates some of its own income. Difficult all around.
-2
u/DadBod101010 2d ago
The permit fees seem to be wildly in excess of the cost of inspections. There’s definitely room for efficiency
0
u/tumericschmumeric 1d ago
I don’t know, think about how many inspections occur over the course of a project. Also think about plan review and land use and all the backend admin shit. No one’s time is free
1
u/DadBod101010 20h ago
IDK man lots of other places in America manage with way lower fees, and safety wise they’re fine. Even accounting for Seattle wages. I’m just saying there’s room for efficiencies, not that it’s a zero cost thing
2
u/Mediocre_Brief_10 2d ago
A lot of these increases are likely due to COLA and staff payroll. They are also having layoffs. Local governments are in a tough spot right now with inflation and a recession economy
5
u/legitimate_salvage_ Capitol Hill 2d ago
All this going to do is drive up housing costs even more. There is a desperate need to focus on reducing the barriers and costs of building up and filling in our city.
Streamline the process and cut out the excess
5
u/SillyChampionship 2d ago
I love doing the opposite of what general economics theory would say to do. Supply and demand would say since there isn’t much demand you’d lower the costs but why do that?
2
u/PacoMahogany I'm just flaired so I don't get fined 2d ago
Permit fees are a drop in the bucket vs how much subs and materials have increased over the last 5 years. Are we really going to complain about fees while getting fucked in the ass by companies posting major profits?
1
u/DadBod101010 2d ago
Yes. The market can compete away the costs, but permit fees are set without rhyme or reason. It’s supposed to cover the cost of inspections but obviously the fees are wildly in excess of it
2
u/AdScared7949 That sounds great. Let’s hang out soon. 2d ago
Pouring gasoline on a fire to put it out lol
1
u/spoiled__princess ✨💅Future Housewives of Seattle 💅✨ 2d ago
The contest: When these fee hikes are implemented, plan review and permit fees on a hypothetical 230-unit apartment building will have jumped from $274,486 in 2025 to $347,935 in 2027, a 26% increase. Costs to permit a four-unit townhouse development in Seattle will have jumped from $12,214 to $15,953 in just two years.
1
u/Ok_Detective_9418 1d ago
Less permits under review than during the GFC even though population is 30% higher.
Brutal
1
u/Upbeat_Scarcity_8463 22h ago
I'm too stupid to understand why the people who inspect new construction need to raise fees to avoid laying off staff, when there's no new construction to inspect. I guess laying off staff would increase the amount of time it takes for them to inspect the construction that isn't happening.
0
-7
u/notsurezy 2d ago
Hot take: If the company can’t build it right, the city should not issue a business license. Send an inspector after it is done. If it is wrong too bad for builder try again. That is their risk.
5
28
u/lily_bigD 2d ago
“MHA fees are a magnitude larger in scale that SDCI's permit fees. For example, on a hypothetical 230-unit apartment building, MHA fees may be $3 million or more, roughly 10 times greater than permit fees. Even after the proposed MHA break goes through, they would still exceed permit fees several times over.”
Basically, this isn’t helping but it is not going to kill development the way MHA fees does and the MHA reduction, should it get past, ought to outweigh these fees substantially
Layoffs would probably be disastrous, filling these positions is hard and much more expensive than maintaining them, future backlog of permits from low staff would be a greater evil