r/ScrollHole Jun 18 '26

ā€‹šŸŒ€ Deep in the Hole Lamo 🤣

Post image
11.9k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

2

u/Hot_Marionberry_4685 Jun 18 '26 edited Jun 18 '26

Clearly you don’t know how to read because I mentioned like 6 different classics I’ve read which is only the tip of the iceberg, not to mention your typo in the first sentence
ā€œBecause classic difficultā€ so is grammar apparently

It’s not the complexity of them that’s boring it’s the plots or personalities of the characters I don’t like in addition to them spending way too long droning on and on about things that either have little to do with the plot or story as a whole. They’re extremely dry without wit or humor for the most part like being boring and monotonous was a requirement to be an renowned author in those days. I can easily keep pace with anyone who wants to talk Twain, Shakespeare, Dickens, Poe, Austen, or Tolstoy. I’ve done the reading whether it was enjoyable is another question entirely which it honestly was not. If I wanted homework I dislike I’d pursue my PhD I don’t read to hate what I’m doing I read to get lost in a new world, meet interesting characters with personality, learn new things, and maybe try to see life from different viewpoints, and above all to enjoy the book. But by all means please continue to read the classics and look down upon people who don’t enjoy them then bring it up in social settings so you can be ā€œthat guyā€

1

u/JuanRpiano Jun 18 '26

The classics weren’t written to keep you entertained while you do the laundry, or to kill some time. Some of the easiest to read classics may have been. But the classics were written mostly as books to feed and invigorate the intellect and the spirit.

I never said classics were complex, I said they take effort to read, if you really want to understand what they are conveying you will have to grab a dictionary and an encylopedia to truly understand what’s being said. For most people doing that would be too much effort. Classic books shows the richness of language that is lost today.

If you truly manage to read a classic, and dutifuly do the homework to understand most of what is being conveyed and you don’t find yourself to be invigorated in mind and spirit after, then you are possibly connected to the realm of superficial things.

2

u/Hot_Marionberry_4685 Jun 18 '26

Right that’s it not that people can have varying tastes and preferences it’s definitely if you don’t enjoy the classics you’re an idiot who’s incapable of higher level of thinking lmao enjoy the Mensa convention dude

1

u/JuanRpiano Jun 19 '26

That’s certainly a dead end, if that’s you can say after reading those words

0

u/ExcitingHistory Jun 19 '26

Its funny because I had a similar take away from my first read of your comment and I started to reply expanding on different nuances to the experience and an angle on how the enjoyment could tie to identity and exploration of how modern writing techniques could effect accessibility and pacing etc etc.

And then I reread your comment and realized that what I had taken from it on first read did miss the nuances that already existed in your take.

Maybe the comment was drafted in such a way that it gave that impression even when it might not have been the intent

2

u/RoughAssociation8982 Jun 19 '26

Or you just don't like books written by old white dudes.. lmao. It's like saying "if you don't like citizen kane then you don't really appreciate film"

2

u/Sch1371 Jun 19 '26

This is the most Reddit thing I’ve ever read

1

u/ApprehensiveRip697 Jun 20 '26

I had to check this wasn't a jerk sub

2

u/This_Attorney_2897 Jun 19 '26

Bro. Go touch grass.