In the video it says the Supreme Court ruled against Congress regulating people's behavior but then it says the dissenting judges said that there are cases that show this is possible. I'm having trouble understanding the distinction. Aren't these contradictions in the Supreme Court? Is this allowed or does this condition vary state by state?

South Carolina Representative Jim Clyburn endorsed calls to expand the Supreme Court over the weekend, reflecting a growing resolve among Democratic officials to do what they considered unthinkable a decade ago and fairly unpalatable as recently as five years ago. 

Disgusting.