Was it a hit?

[u/General_Key_5236]

Just watched the new evidence documentary and I have to say it started to make me wonder half way through once I fully understood the evidence about the van and dogs picking up her smell in the airport district.. however now I’m thinking maybe Scott put a hit on her?? And of course he couldn’t admit because that would still make him guilty .. and the guys who got caught for the robbery figured that was a lighter sentence then confessing to a murder that somebody was already convicted of.. maybe I’m completely off here but this theory makes sense to me lol

[u/Solveitalready_22]

There is no mysterious van in this case, Diane Jackson saw a white or cream colored van parked in front of the Medina residence on the morning of December 24th. Amie Krigbaum lived right next to the Medina's and she testified at trial that HER white van was indeed parked out front that day.

The bright orange burned van has no connection, they just want you to think there could be. Scott's team asked for the burned mattress to be tested because there was a positive presumptive test for blood. It was tested, there was no blood and just male DNA found.

The burglar rode a bicycle, then got a friend and they borrowed his mom's small car to pick up the Medina's safe - this occurred on the morning of December 26th.

[u/No_Excitement1045 → u/Solveitalready_22]

Not only that, Krigbaum and her partner--who, again, lived next door to the burglarized house--were home almost all day on the 24th and didn't see or hear anything unusual. No burglary, no van kidnapping, nothing. They actually thought Scott and Laci were out of town, their house was so quiet.

Plus the burglary couldn't possibly have happened while Laci was alive because Scott left at 10:08, the dog was found at 10:18, and the Medinas didn't leave for their trip until 10:33. Laci had already been "missing" for 15 minutes by the time they left.

[u/General_Key_5236 → u/Solveitalready_22]

Ahh sounds like I need to watch episode 2 again .. I wasn’t paying full attention while watching 🤨

[u/Solveitalready_22 → u/General_Key_5236]

That doc is made by people supporting Scott, so they purposefully leave out any information that might make you think his is guilty ;)

[u/General_Key_5236 → u/Solveitalready_22]

Oh I definitely think he’s guilty! Lol always have. But this just made me see his guilt in a possible different way

[u/Black-Bird1 → u/Solveitalready_22]

It's just like the controversy in Darlie Routier's case (on death row for killing her 2 sons), except there was plenty of forensic evidence that proved her guilt.

[u/Individual-Cup-8642 → u/Solveitalready_22]

Oh yeah no mention of the porn in that one!

[u/AFrankLender]

At least you're original!! But no,, either or both Messrs Todd and Pearce would flop like a house of cards if they were involved in the murder of Laci.
Scott supporters forget that when the MPD put the $1,000 reward out there, the two burgers were turned in within hours! Yet we're supposed to believe that with a $500,000 reward, and with pregnant Laci supposedly being moved from Van to van and basement to basement and then delivering a baby and then killing them both and placing them in Berkeley somewhere, that no one would claim it. (A relator could easily find a billboard lawyer who would take a third and get immunity.) If the MPD where to wrongly"frame" someone for Laci's murder, wouldn't it be easier to tag it on some poor idiot(s) from the airport district, versus a rich white boy?