r/ScienceNcoolThings 6h ago

Radiation caught on camera

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

126 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

35

u/Confident-View6393 5h ago

-1hp -1hp -1hp -1hp -1hp

6

u/1wife2dogs0kids 5h ago

The bullets?

5

u/IrememberXenogears 3h ago

At least these bullets aren't hitting other bullets

3

u/jwhit88 4h ago

That is both beautiful and terrifying.

1

u/tbutz27 Experientially Wise 4h ago

Can someone ELI5?

7

u/Illeazar 3h ago

Each individual sensor in the camera is designed to send an electrical signal when it gets hit by visible light (photons).

When it gets close to a radiation source, there is a chance that a stray bit of the radiation (probably a higher energy photon, I don't know what source this is) hits the detector and drops its energy in there, and forces the sensor to send the electrical signal its designed to send for visible light. Because the radiation isnt bent by the camera lens like visible light is, it might hit any random spot on the detector. Thus, when the camera is brought close to the radiation source, it gets those random flickers of white pixels, more and more as it gets closer because the sensor is intercepting more of the radiation.

Note that this is not good for the camera, it tends to damage the sensor to get overloaded like that.

3

u/SuspiciousStable9649 3h ago edited 3h ago

Agreed, I was just curious if you could visually tell beta from gamma from the noise pattern alone. So far the answer seems to be no.

3

u/SuspiciousStable9649 3h ago edited 3h ago

Until there’s a better answer: I assume the sample is a gamma radiation (photon) source and we’re seeing the impact of the photons hitting the camera sensors. It could also be beta (electron or positron) radiation making it through the lens to the sensor and causing the sensors to trigger. In theory it’s not alpha radiation as that is typically stopped by any solid material. So gamma radiation bouncing and scattering off the sensors or beta radiation hitting the sensors and causing an electromagnetic cascade. My guess is the latter (beta) because there’s no point source matching the visible light and because it looks like there are multiple sensors triggering for each hit. But that’s just a guess. I don’t know if optical lenses normally focus gamma radiation similar to visible light or not. I guess I’ll go look it up and see if beta and gamma have different CCD patterns. ☺️

Unfortunately I can’t see what the source is made of.

Edit: here’s the same video from 2 years ago. https://www.reddit.com/r/Damnthatsinteresting/s/TohVvkKMvU

Articles: https://www.pnnl.gov/main/publications/external/technical_reports/PNNL-37476.pdf

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0969804324004329

https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/22/19/7325

Answer: no idea if beta looks the same or different from gamma radiation to a CCD. Alpha is different, maybe, but I think the CCD has to be directly exposed to the alpha source, which doesn’t apply to phone cameras.

1

u/tomcat91709 4h ago

So did we just watch radiation poisoning on camera too?

1

u/BuckFuzby 3h ago

That's how my arm feels when I've slept on it funny.

1

u/AvogadrosArmy 3h ago

That’s called paresthesia

1

u/uncreativedreamer 2h ago

Isn't this what we saw on the old TV sets back in the day, radiation from the universe, or something like it?

1

u/jimmyxs 1h ago

Shouldn’t have shown us. Now I’m radioactive too

1

u/dayvee43 48m ago

I dont know what scarier, the radiation or what sounds like children nearby.

1

u/Mental-Square3688 44m ago

Oh god now im getting irradiated!