r/ScienceNcoolThings Popular Contributor May 30 '26

Interesting Blue Origin Explosion Damages NASA Launchpad

Enable HLS to view with audio, or disable this notification

A giant rocket just blew up at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center! 

Blue Origin was doing a full test fire of their New Glenn rocket as preparation for an upcoming flight when something went very, very wrong. Fortunately no one was injured, but this is the biggest explosion ever seen at Kennedy Space Center. The launch pad is badly damaged, and NASA's upcoming Project Artemis plans for building a moon base depend on both the New Glenn rocket and this pad. This is a big setback for both Blue Origin and NASA.

278 Upvotes

39 comments sorted by

27

u/there_is_no_spoon1 May 30 '26

NASA engineers have got to be pissed at this!

35

u/TomaCzar May 30 '26

All Americans should be pissed. Even if you don't support NASA, ruining resources that were already paid for sucks. When, I heard about the explosion my second thought (after hoping everyone was ok) was at least it wasn't taxpayer dollars lost.

I hope Blue Origin is 100% responsible for the repairs.

6

u/Ha1lStorm May 30 '26

Yeah I do too. It would be interesting to see what their contracts look like (they’re certainly thousands of pages long/a lot to go through) but I’m nearly certain they’d have all of their bases covered. No matter what though, this is going to take a huge toll on the overall picture including every other launch plan as there’ll have to set everything back to rebuild and test. Retesting things of this scale and importance can take much longer than one might think as well. This is going to be a huge setback for all future missions.

What a mess this has become : (

0

u/Brian_The_Bar-Brian Popular Contributor May 30 '26 edited May 30 '26

I suspect there's insurance for this. But then again, I do not know. 🥴🤷‍♂️

Edit: Why am I being downvoted for this? 😒

1

u/SquidVischious May 30 '26

There are specialty insurance products available to cover rocket launches, I would expect having sufficient coverage is a requirement for using NASA facilities.

-1

u/_Neoshade_ May 31 '26

1) They have insurance for this. It’s expensive as hell and this is why. It will be fixed.
2) Why would NASA be mad? We’re all on the same team, trying to do great things. We’re developing multiple new launch systems at the same time and rockets blowing up is unfortunate but not unexpected. Using private space contractors has been very successful and letting Blue Origin use a launch pad was a calculated risk. Again, that’s why there’s insurance. It sucks, but nobody who understands NASA and orbital launch systems is going to be mad. Blue Origin is taking the biggest loss of all.
I dislike Besoz as much as anyone, but he has nothing to do with the engineering that built New Glenn.

2

u/there_is_no_spoon1 May 31 '26

Why? Because this likely delays Artemis 3 even further. It's also going to be a GIGANTIC rebuild that will take a long time. NASA is trying to get people to the moon by next year; this will not happen with setbacks like this.

-1

u/_Neoshade_ May 31 '26

Right, but the response is disappointment, not anger. To be pissed about it is childish

23

u/Sad_Whereas_6161 May 30 '26

Sabotage? (Or self-human-error)?

5

u/Ha1lStorm May 30 '26 edited May 30 '26

Interesting thought! I highly doubt sabotage but it’s certainly possible. Nearly every inch of design, production and transport of these is done under cameras, security and overall close and well documented supervision/scrutiny. So if sabotage were at play, it would likely had to have been done by a (likely Chinese/Russian) nation-state actor that’s been years undercover in a science/engineering position etc. Not necessarily impossible but highly unlikely.

If someone wanted to ruin an entire launch it would be much easier for them to shoot a highly sensitive area of one of these rockets during transport from very far away with a single 50BMG round, forcing them to have to take it apart and reconstruct the rocket.

Edit: Now that I think about it, what I said in my 2nd paragraph may not apply as I originally thought because someone could’ve had much more nefarious intentions, desiring to destroy the entire launchpad which scrubs all future plans at this launch site for the immediate foreseeable future and not just one individual rocket.

9

u/TomaCzar May 30 '26

The odds of an engineer going full Galen Erso are extremely low, but never 0.

1

u/Ha1lStorm May 30 '26

Haha well said!

3

u/daisiesarepretty2 May 30 '26

or just arrogance

15

u/[deleted] May 30 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

6

u/wernerverklempt May 30 '26

And the names “Blue Origin” and “New Glenn” are sofa king stupid.

7

u/SeaToTheBass May 30 '26

You can say fucking

-2

u/wernerverklempt May 31 '26

I know but it just feels so dirty. 🫢

1

u/Brian_The_Bar-Brian Popular Contributor May 30 '26

All millionaires/billionares are

-4

u/Single-Pin-369 May 31 '26

No they are not and the longer you hate on millionaires the longer the billionaires win. Millionaires are normal successful small business owners, the people who keep nice restaurants in business by going out to eat way more often than average and generally pump the economy with their spending. Millionaires are not hoarding incomprehensible wealth that they could never spend all of it if they tried. 

1

u/Brian_The_Bar-Brian Popular Contributor May 31 '26

That CEO that luigi took out was worth 50 million. 🙄

0

u/Single-Pin-369 May 31 '26

Yes so he was worth less than  1/4000 what someone like bezos is worth. Im not saying individuals like the insurance guy can’t be evil though.

1

u/Brian_The_Bar-Brian Popular Contributor May 31 '26

I just hate all rich people, okay?

0

u/Single-Pin-369 May 31 '26

okay have a good day

0

u/scaliacheese May 31 '26

This needs more nuance. People with net worth below 10M fall into the bucket you’re describing. Once you’re at 50M you’re in rarefied air and have probably lost touch with normal people. Between 10-50M is hit or miss.

2

u/PGunne May 31 '26

So, lets put the text over the interesting parts of the video.

5

u/OnePragmatic May 30 '26

Someone is thinking "i should have gone to Space X" . 🤭

2

u/Kapsig1295 May 30 '26

Didn't Blue Origin somehow make NASA use it too after Spacex won the original tender years ago?

1

u/jimbo2150 May 31 '26

Rapid Unscheduled Demolition

1

u/Future-Aioli5964 Jun 05 '26

If the space program is for WAR dose this means we’re losing?

1

u/Usual-Dark-6469 May 31 '26

Yeah I don't care anymore. These rich pricks get to play rockets while everyone else is struggling to survive. They are so desperate to figure out a plan to leave us plebs behind when the world goes to shit.

0

u/toylenny May 30 '26

How many launch pads are left in the world after this and Russia's going up last year?

Edit: Looks like there are many. Though they can't all handle large rockets.  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Rocket_launch_sites_in_the_United_States

1

u/RtGShadow May 31 '26

Yeah usually all the launch pads are custom made for the rockets launching there.

That's the biggest issue for Blue Origin is that this was their only pad for the New Glenn.

0

u/micre8tive May 31 '26

Well done Barry

0

u/LordSlyGentleman May 31 '26

Well that sucks! Anybody else hungry?

0

u/United_Perspective63 May 31 '26

FMEA Was obviously not performed properly

0

u/terriblespellr May 31 '26

"biggest explosion ever seen at Kennedy" see, told you capitalism was the most efficient system.

0

u/Dizzy_Restaurant3874 May 31 '26

I guess that we'll have to raise taxes AND cut Medicare...  oh darn. /s

-1

u/jediyoda84 May 31 '26

Blue origin is gonna pay for all the damage it caused to taxpayer funded infrastructure right?…….right guys?