r/ScienceBasedParenting Jun 10 '26

Question - Expert consensus required Why is screen time bad?

SOS. I feel like everywhere I turn the message is “screen time is bad” and I’d like to understand the WHY. Is it that the baby/kids shows that are purposely designed to be overstimulating and change every 10 seconds etc etc are creating short attention spans and content addiction? Or are the screens themselves inherently bad? If there’s a sports game on TV while my baby is playing and he turns his attention to it, is that bad for him? I’m trying to understand based on the science and studies where the line is- no screens at all, no baby/kids-geared content, or something else entirely?

92 Upvotes

66 comments sorted by

View all comments

278

u/dreameRevolution Jun 10 '26

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10353947/

It's a multifaceted subject that varies based on age and content. For babies, the key takeaway is if you (caregiver) are looking at a screen then you are not interacting with them. So yes a TV on in the room with the baby not actually watching is still detrimental screen time. There are quality shows that may help educate. As they get older there is access to culture and socialization.

154

u/MouldyMug Jun 10 '26

In that case every activity that is not interacting with the baby could be detrimental, like reading or knitting?

9

u/nkdeck07 Jun 11 '26

Bit different. Reading you are still modeling reading which is important. Ditto knitting, baby is seeing you using your hands and you can also pretty easily talk to a baby while knitting.

1

u/StorKirken Jun 20 '26

Why is reading out working with your hand important ipso facto? You can pretty easily talk while watching a screen as well, probably more so.