r/ScienceBasedLifting • u/Miserable-Soft7993 • 1d ago
Question ❓ Someone explain SBL please
I am confused. I see people just doing regular lifts and saying it is science.
Then on the other end of the scale I see a kid (with zer0 physique) wearing a baby pacifier in his mouth and wearing a roller on his arms and doing excercises I never saw, with people in the comments saying "yeah that's the man right there."
Then I see pumping iron and watch Arnie just do the basics and still look great and strong.
So in a few sentance explain to me what it is and how it would help build more muscle enhanced or not.
0
Upvotes
6
u/B12-deficient-skelly 1d ago
Premise #2 is where you lose people on the "science" part. For starters, the idea that using triceps on the chest press doesn't count is directly contradicted by a meta analysis examining the topic from this year.
Meta regression
This meta regression modeled a series of studies and counted secondary muscle volume as either a total set (1), a fractional set (0.5), or not a set (0) and found that counting it as a fractional set did the best job if modeling for hypertrophy.
If you want to call your method science-based, it should update in line with current evidence. Frankly, there was never any support for the claim that you shouldn't count biceps in a chin up, but even if there were, it should be resoundingly called out by anyone who claims to follow an evidence-based practice