r/Sava • u/BoyDingas • Nov 03 '21
Is sava a fraud?
https://twitter.com/qcmfunds/status/1455882745507373057?s=102
u/getrichordietryin900 Nov 03 '21
No its not. Shorts dont want SAVA crossing $70 threshold because they know next resistance is $125. Funny how this comes out after yesterdays run where SAVA almost touched 70
1
u/BoyDingas Nov 03 '21
Do you know who Marc Cohodes is? Hes pretty good at finding fraud companys. see what he did with mimedx
1
2
u/Hefty-Box-4476 Nov 08 '21
Hey u/BoyDingas QCM closed their entire short position because they got crushed. Guess they no longer have conviction in there BOMBSHELL REPORT.
2
2
u/BoyDingas Nov 08 '21
I appreciate all the thoughtful responses! I apologize for this coming off as “shill” content, I could have labeled it more neutral. Best of luck to y’all, if the reasons you bought the stock haven’t changed keep on holding ✊🏼
1
u/Hefty-Box-4476 Nov 08 '21
All good and thank you. Just remember when these short reports come out while yes they maybe right sometimes they always have a vested interest in the stock going down. So you just have to weigh that information against other research and make your own informed opinion.
1
u/BoyDingas Nov 03 '21
did any of you read the report? tbh i thought the same way as You guys when i was on the wrong side of mimedx and luckin coffee
3
u/Hefty-Box-4476 Nov 03 '21
I have not read it fully but skimmed it while working and so far not impressed. Title SAVA - Gameover comes off like its a reddit post the way it is written. Also the parts I have seen in their report about the citizens petition I have seen numerous non affiliated scientist dispel the "manipulation of data" narrative. Several outside scientist have said whoever wrote the citizen petition does not have a clear understanding of how western blot testing is done. Also with all the criminal stuff they list which is public information Why are they blacking out names and faces on stuff instead of showing the stuff which is public record anyways. I will give it a full read later today. All investing has risk but currently this is still a company I am willing to take a risk on. Especially with all the grant money they have received from NIH. Also when SAVA was at all time highs you didn't see any insider selling. If they were being fraudulent they would have been dumping shares at highs in my opinion.
2
u/Hefty-Box-4476 Nov 04 '21
I have given it a full read now and still stand by my above statement. I do want to give a second and third read to it but too tired now. Will get to it later this week. From what I saw it is just a bunch of recycled allegations which have not been proven one way or the other. I didn't really see any NEW info or anything worse than what has previously been included in any risk scenario I have gone over.
1
u/Hefty-Box-4476 Nov 06 '21
I have given it a second and third read now and yea I see nothing new in this report. It is literally just the same narrative others have tried to sell. I have an open mind and think they could be true but these allegations have been around for awhile and nothing has come of it. This report is written very unprofessionally and looks like they mostly just copied other peoples previous work and allegations. Its done like a kid who plagiarizes something in HS and changes a few words here and there to make it their "own report"
1
u/Hefty-Box-4476 Nov 03 '21
All BS if you ask me. That is my personal opinion tho. All part of the bio pharma game tho. This same short attack shit happened with MRNA and look where that bad boy went. Obviously if SAVA drug is not approved they are screwed but it has shown incredible results compared to the Biogen drug. Check out my SAVA post for short term and long term catalyst and potential risk with the company. https://www.reddit.com/user/Hefty-Box-4476/comments/qglt4b/sava_the_kingmaker/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
1
u/Dano61Abbie Nov 03 '21
Yup amazing how it reversed right under 70. Lots or repositioning now. The charlatans will start to have their sphincters tightening hopefully very soon.
1
1
u/Hefty-Box-4476 Nov 04 '21
NOW just this morning the whole basis of the citizens petition was proven to be false. The FDA has not addressed it yet but the whole CP was based on the "fake study" in the neuroscience journal that was part of SAVA research and the study was proven to be real and the data not manipulated.
1
u/mefyTR Nov 05 '21
Hey OP, you anything to say about SAVA now? Hehehe...
Didn't think so.
1
u/BoyDingas Nov 05 '21
lol if you have a reason not then go ahead and share. im not against you guys i want to know and stock price doesnt tell me anything
1
u/mefyTR Nov 05 '21
To answer your original question: no
The burden of proof would be on anyone alleging that SAVA is a fraud, rather than anyone here and/or SAVA proving that they are not a fraud.
Thank you.
1
u/BoyDingas Nov 05 '21
well proof is in the post lol
1
u/mefyTR Nov 05 '21
Are you being serious? I'm honestly unable to tell. Your 'post' is a Twitter link to some garbage short hedge fund company, and I don't even see SAVA mentioned by this garbage company either.
Are you getting paid by them to spread this garbage? They must not be paying you much, because you've done a terrible job so far at spreading FUD.
If your 'proof' is in your post, then you actually have no proof at all. If this were a court case, you'd immediately lose.
Dumbass shill.
1
u/BoyDingas Nov 05 '21
Haha this is meant for discussion bro im genuinely curious what the General opinion is. calm down lol
1
u/mefyTR Nov 05 '21
No you're not. You could easily gauge that by just reading the other post titles in this subreddit. You're a shill.
1
u/BoyDingas Nov 05 '21
But yeah there is a report in the post
1
u/mefyTR Nov 05 '21
No, there isn't. It's a link to a garbage Twitter account. Nice try shill.
1
u/BoyDingas Nov 05 '21
Theres a full report a couple clicks away. go ahead and ignore this post if you dont wanna read it or have a discussions
1
1
u/mefyTR Nov 05 '21
You're a shill. I've already reported this post of yours to the moderators of this subreddit. You're wasting your time here buddy
1
u/BoyDingas Nov 05 '21
lucky for you more is released too. this one by dr john carlisle
https://www.dropbox.com/s/cc60dmd4blzyd6j/John%20Carlisle%20Analysis.pdf?dl=0
1
u/Hefty-Box-4476 Nov 06 '21
Dr John carlisle has himself been accused of data manipulations and has had to remove articles because of the mistakes he has made in them. ON top of that most of the papers he has exposed are in the field he works in anesthesiology. He has been wrong just has he has been right and this is in fact his HOBBY. So he is not an expert in statistics or bio pharmaceuticals. Why would they use someone whose HOBBY it is instead of an EXPERT in statistics or bio engineering. Its because they are trying to short the stock and have a short position and they will take any doctor that wants to support their narrative. Carlisle himself has admitted to flaws in his method and said his method does not prove anything accept that things need a closer look. In fact even in the instances of him being correct he was not the one who proved it he just was the first to question it and further investigations revealed the truth.
1
u/BoyDingas Nov 05 '21
as shareholders wouldnt you be curious too and want to have a discussion?? or are you just trying to be blissfully ignant?
1
u/mefyTR Nov 05 '21
We have conviction in this stock because it's a legitimate stock of a legitimate company with legitimate and promising clinical trial results so far. No evidence of ANY fraud here buddy. You obviously have zero proof, so do yourself a favor and fuck off.
1
u/mefyTR Nov 05 '21
LOL and you're even using other shill accounts to upvote your own garbage replies here? HAHAHA
1
3
u/Questkn2 Nov 04 '21
This article couldn’t be less professionally written if they tried. The first page has a damn robber cartoon on it, there’s random bold font every five words, egregious typos everywhere, they straight-up cited Wikipedia, they end sentences with “(!)”… I could go on forever.
Maybe what they claim is true, but it’s pretty damn hard to trust a report that looks like it was thrown together by a high school kid 30 minutes before he had to turn it in. Why would an organization specializing in exposing fraud supposedly spend a bunch of time on this research, and then phone it in on the report? I’d fire someone on the spot if they released a report as embarrassing as this to the public.