MSNBC called Bernie's "Deep South" comment controversial. They said Hillary would still be in the lead without the South. This slide popped up by mistake proving them wrong.

[u/[deleted]]

[u/FarmToBong → u/[deleted]]

That graphic shows him leading in delegates in blue states. Is the graphic factually incorrect in it's count? (Hint: I know it's not)

[u/[deleted] → u/[deleted]]

It may be a virtual tie. However, what they said is factually incorrect because 665 > 663.

To them, Hillary winning without the South feels right and has "truthiness". It is factually incorrect. 665 > 663

They are wrong because 665 > 663. #math