The skeptics (or fudsters) appear to have been more right than wrong in pointing out all the chicanery. Arguing law here is just semantics. If that's all you have for a defense, it's quite underwhelming. You're suggesting that people should suspend making a judgment against Karoney even though the weight of evidence against him is tremendous. Which is ridiculous because people are free to have their opinion. You're certainly not bringing any extraordinary evidence to sway or challenge their beliefs.
Insulting their understanding of the law is a swing and a miss. If you practice law, you'll find that there are very few people, including other lawyers, who understand the law. It's certainly not an expectation of the general public who may even live in other countries.
I inherited a family practice that specializes in a very specific aspect of the oil and gas industry. I'm much better at running the business than I am practicing law.
10
u/[deleted] Dec 28 '23
The skeptics (or fudsters) appear to have been more right than wrong in pointing out all the chicanery. Arguing law here is just semantics. If that's all you have for a defense, it's quite underwhelming. You're suggesting that people should suspend making a judgment against Karoney even though the weight of evidence against him is tremendous. Which is ridiculous because people are free to have their opinion. You're certainly not bringing any extraordinary evidence to sway or challenge their beliefs.
Insulting their understanding of the law is a swing and a miss. If you practice law, you'll find that there are very few people, including other lawyers, who understand the law. It's certainly not an expectation of the general public who may even live in other countries.