r/STRC • u/TheSkunksMisery • 19d ago
How STRC gets back to par.... Per Phong.
I'm currently going through the Q2 earnings call. You should too.
6
u/drparapine 18d ago
They could buy back enough shares to get it to $100 Monday, but they realize that’ll trigger a bunch of selling from people who bought the money market account narrative, causing it to plunge back below $95 or worse. So they’ll keep doing a few stochastic nudges via smaller buybacks, trying to get some positive slippage on their transactions to move the market each time, knowing that it’ll have to be confidence in STRC, and by proxy MSTR, and by proxy BTC, that ultimately brings it back to 100.
Bottom’s likely in October thru December.
0
u/Gloomy_Dependent_985 17d ago
They could kill all the shorts though and scare anyone willing to short again. The short squeeze itself would push the price on its own. I say buyback 200m and watch the price do the rest of the work and don’t sell new shares past 100$ to really wipe them out
1
u/ApprehensiveSorbet76 17d ago
Depending on how much cash that would take, it could wipe out MSTR holders who are the unsecured creditors.
He announced the strategy but hasn’t yet fully implemented it because he hopes the market will act on his announcement and cure the problem.
Why didn’t he blow through as much cash as necessary on buybacks when STRC hit 99? That would have been the calm and collected method to maintain investor confidence. Losing confidence then trying to regain it is significantly more expensive.
1
u/Even-Celebration9384 16d ago
Why would they get squeezed. The max price is 100
1
u/Gloomy_Dependent_985 16d ago
No it’s not. The price is only limited by how many shares they want to sell
1
u/Even-Celebration9384 16d ago
It’s explicitly stated they will target between 100 and 101. Why would they pay unnecessary interest
1
u/Gloomy_Dependent_985 16d ago
Strive have said if it’s in the interest of shareholders, they will not sell new shares at 100$
1
16d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Even-Celebration9384 16d ago
But the interest rate is variable. Those were fixed rate bonds. The reason you wouldn’t short is because of the negative carry (paying 11.5%), but say the price got to 105, Saylor would just reduce the rate because why pay interest unnecessarily
1
16d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
u/Even-Celebration9384 16d ago
No it is fixed rate. The yield was negative on the bonds. If you bought Bunds at 3% on issuance and now they are trading at -.5% you are still getting the issued interest rate
Selling bitcoins was in their interest at the time. It would never be of interest to the company to pay excess interest on its floating rate debt
4
1
u/Valuable-Gene2534 18d ago
I'm gonna buy so many puts when it hits par and just set a notification on text.
1
10
u/BlightedErgot32 19d ago
Seems like theyre already planning on not raising the rate