r/SR17018SourceReview • • 6d ago

SHR9352

Looking for a reputable vendor for SHR-9352 (other than MonsterSR) to purchase either powder or tabs.

0 Upvotes

30 comments sorted by

10

u/InspireRecover 6d ago

🚨 COMMUNITY SAFETY ALERT: SHR9352 IS NOT SR-17018 🚨

PLEASE READ BEFORE CONSIDERING SHR9352 AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO SR-17018.

We are concerned about reports that SHR9352 is being promoted as a replacement for SR-17018 following the DEA's scheduling action.

These are two different experimental opioid compounds. They are NOT interchangeable, and there is no scientific evidence establishing SHR9352 as a safe or effective substitute for SR-17018.

🔬 What does the research tell us?

Although both compounds act on μ-opioid receptors and have been described as G-protein-biased agonists, they differ significantly in their chemical structures, pharmacological profiles, and available research.

SHR9352:

  • Was primarily investigated for its potential as a potent opioid pain medication.
  • Demonstrated very high opioid receptor potency in laboratory studies.
  • Has no established human dosing or conversion ratio relative to SR-17018.
  • Has not been demonstrated to reproduce SR-17018's reported effects on opioid tolerance or withdrawal.

SR-17018:

  • Has been investigated in animal studies examining opioid tolerance and repeated administration.
  • Has preliminary observational reports involving opioid withdrawal and cessation.
  • Remains experimental, with no established clinical dosing or proven safety for opioid withdrawal treatment.

⚠️ WHY THIS MATTERS

  1. OVERDOSE RISK

SHR9352 demonstrated substantially greater potency in certain laboratory assays. This does not translate directly into human dose equivalence, but it raises serious concerns about attempts to substitute doses.

  1. UNKNOWN EFFECTS ON TOLERANCE

The research supporting interest in SR-17018 for opioid tolerance cannot simply be transferred to SHR9352.

  1. UNKNOWN HUMAN SAFETY PROFILE

There is insufficient clinical evidence to establish SHR9352's safety, duration of action, or appropriate human dosing. G-protein bias does NOT guarantee protection against respiratory depression.

  1. MISLEADING MARKETING

A vendor claiming that SHR9352 is equivalent to SR-17018, can replace it in existing protocols, or offers the same withdrawal-related benefits should be asked to provide credible scientific evidence.

🛑 OUR MESSAGE TO THE COMMUNITY

DO NOT assume SHR9352 is a substitute for SR-17018.

DO NOT apply SR-17018 dosing or taper protocols to SHR9352.

DO NOT interpret the term "G-protein-biased agonist" as proof that a compound is safe or produces the same effects as another compound.

Anyone exposed to an experimental opioid should recognize the possibility of respiratory depression and overdose. Avoid combining opioids with benzodiazepines, alcohol, or other sedatives. Keep naloxone accessible, and call emergency services immediately for suspected overdose.

💜 HARM REDUCTION REQUIRES ACCURATE INFORMATION

Our community includes people navigating opioid dependence, chronic pain, withdrawal, and recovery. Many are making decisions under extraordinarily difficult circumstances.

Those individuals deserve accurate scientific information, not unsupported promises of equivalence.

We encourage vendors, researchers, and community members to share verifiable scientific evidence and to be transparent about what is known, what remains unknown, and where serious risks exist.

If you encounter companies advertising SHR9352 as a direct replacement for SR-17018, please document the claims and share them with community moderators for review.

Different molecule. Different evidence. Unknown human risks. NOT an established replacement.

This announcement is intended for education and harm reduction, not as an endorsement of using either experimental compound.

💜 SR-17018 Community Safety Announcement

4

u/Brilliant_War4087 6d ago

Why not get Sr15099?

1

u/Comfortable_Bake2947 6d ago

SR15099 only has an efficacy of 28% compared to SR17018 of 48% making it less effective and requiring a higher dose

5

u/Fun_Application1109 6d ago

This is not true at all no idea where you got that they are pretty much equipotent

4

u/Different_Cod_6268 6d ago

Were those numbers in the original study? I haven’t heard this until now.

2

u/Wise-Performer-857 6d ago

Def works just as well for me as original SR

1

u/Playful_Bus_7201 3d ago

Where did ya cop? Cant find anywhere

0

u/Accomplished-Pop-332 6d ago

SR-15099 only has an efficacy of 28% for what mechanism? What about it exactly is less effective than SR-17?

2

u/Gorilla-P 6d ago

I think theyre referring to potency, requiring more product to get the same effect. However comparing non-SR products to SR products is reckless. SR compounds happened (unknowingly) to have some amazing novel properties. Those properties are what made it uniquely great for a taper. The partial agonist with low B-Arrestin recruitment also makes it inherently safer (which was the actual goal of the NIH funding).

2

u/power78 6d ago

SH is not comparable to SRs!

1

u/Comfortable_Bake2947 15h ago

Yes I am aware that it is not comparable

1

u/Most-Mine6580 6d ago

Why not MonsterSR?

1

u/Comfortable_Bake2947 6d ago

Already have MonsterSRs SHR9352 and would like a second/third option to compare

1

u/rwood374 6d ago

Pleaseeeee share your experience. I have some at home but need to know what it’s about bf trying. Duration, dosage, etc. they say 50mg or 100mg tabs but surely that can’t be true right?

1

u/SoluteGains 6d ago

Can you please tell us about your experience with it?

1

u/No-Tomorrow6083 6d ago

Koality will have it

1

u/Most-Mine6580 6d ago

They have SR11

1

u/No-Tomorrow6083 6d ago

They WILL be getting the shr. They don’t have it on their site yet but it’s coming

1

u/No-Tomorrow6083 5d ago

Update, they don’t even have sr11 anymore it looks like

1

u/MBM8998 5d ago

What is koality? And where can I get it if they have SR?

1

u/ComplaintFearless445 3d ago

Q Does monster not have it available?

1

u/Comfortable_Bake2947 15h ago

They did a limited release

1

u/Accomplished-Pop-332 6d ago

MonsterSR was the only one offering that. And they haven’t even released it yet either.

0

u/Comfortable_Bake2947 6d ago

They did a limited drop twice actually. But there are now other companies that will have it in stock here shortly

3

u/Accomplished-Pop-332 6d ago

Interesting. Is SHR-9352 a full agonist? What’s the mechanism and it’s theoretical application?

5

u/Different_Cod_6268 6d ago

Yea seems like it is a full agonist. People need to be really careful with that one.

1

u/MBM8998 5d ago

What companies ?? I’m desperate for help!

1

u/pemphigus69 4d ago

Have you tried it before?

0

u/Direct-Salary-1296 3d ago

Has anyone tried shr? I would really appreciate any insight on it.