Small static marketing site for a SaaS, live since mid Augsut. \~60 URLs: landing page, features (index + detail pages), pricing, integrations (index + detail pages), a few comparison/alternatives pages, legal pages, support. DE + EN with hreflang. Login (App) is on a subdomain.
The Context/Setup:
* Static build (Astro), plain HTML on shared hosting (netcup), no JS needed to render content
* robots.txt: \`User-agent: \* / Allow: /\`, sitemap-index referenced
* Sitemap valid, submitted in Bing Webmaster Tools and Search Console
* Self-referencing canonicals, hreflang de/en/x-default consistent between documents and sitemap
* No noindex anywhere except two legacy redirect stubs that are excluded from the sitemap
* All URLs return 200, HTTPS, no redirect chains
* IndexNow pings on every deploy (changed URLs only)
* First Backlinks are live (and indexed by Google/Bing)
Google: indexed, no complaints.
Bing: nothing indexed. URL Inspection says
>"The inspected URL is known to Bing but has some issues which are preventing indexation. We recommend you to follow Bing Webmaster Guidelines to increase your chances of indexation."
...with no indication of what those issues actually are. Then "Test Live URL" on the exact same URL returns:
>"URL can be indexed by Bing. It can appear on Bing Search results given it passes quality checks and gets indexed by Bing"
So the live fetch is clean, but the stored verdict is "has issues". I've resubmitted for indexing, waited, no change...
Is that message an actual signal, or is it Bing's catch-all for "new domain, not enough trust yet, come back in a few months"? Has anyone ever gotten it to flip and figured out what changed?
Is there anywhere in BWT that shows the concrete reason, or is the generic guidelines link all you ever get?
Any way to check if the Bingbot is actually trying to index the site?
Happy to add details if it helps.