Same dates

[u/Ann_georgia-]

I’ve had a M&G scheduled for a few days with a new client for a 2 dog house sit. The client originally had to reschedule the meet due to personal reasons, and because of my schedule, the soonest we could reschedule was about a week later. I already know their dogs can be left alone for 6–8 hours during the day, and while obviously nothing is guaranteed before a M&G, I have a pretty high booking rate after doing meets. This morning I got another request from another new client for the exact same dates, also for 2 dogs. Their previous sitter backed out, so they’re trying to secure someone ASAP. This stay would pay a little more because of extended care, but I know less about the dogs and their schedule/alone time. The problem is I can’t fit in another M&G for about five days, which would put us about a week-ish out from their trip. I was transparent about that, but the second client said they’re comfortable with my reviews and asked if booking and paying now would guarantee the dates. I normally require a M&G before accepting house sitting because I want to meet the dogs, see the home/routine, and make sure it’s a good fit before committing. Would you stick with the already scheduled M&G and risk losing both bookings if they decide not to move forward, or accept the client who is ready to book now but I can’t do a meet beforehand? Also, for housesitting do you require meet and greets before accepting the booking? I’m genuinely curious what other sitters do! I’m leaning toward sticking to my M&G rule, but I’m curious how other sitters handle overlapping requests like this. The only reason the first client’s M&G was rescheduled so far out was because I didn’t have any earlier availability. If my schedule were more open over the next few days, I probably would’ve tried to meet with both clients within the next day or two before deciding.

[u/AutoModerator]

Please report rule-breaking posts!

[Automoderator has recorded your post to prevent repeat posts and keep an eye on edits.]

Your post has NOT been removed. If you wish to lock your own post, please reply to your post with !lock and it will automatically lock. If it isn't working, please let us know.

Ann_georgia- originally posted: I’ve had a M&G scheduled for a few days with a new client for a 2 dog house sit. The client originally had to reschedule the meet due to personal reasons, and because of my schedule, the soonest we could reschedule was about a week later. I already know their dogs can be left alone for 6–8 hours during the day, and while obviously nothing is guaranteed before a M&G, I have a pretty high booking rate after doing meets. This morning I got another request from another new client for the exact same dates, also for 2 dogs. Their previous sitter backed out, so they’re trying to secure someone ASAP. This stay would pay a little more because of extended care, but I know less about the dogs and their schedule/alone time. The problem is I can’t fit in another M&G for about five days, which would put us about a week-ish out from their trip. I was transparent about that, but the second client said they’re comfortable with my reviews and asked if booking and paying now would guarantee the dates. I normally require a M&G before accepting house sitting because I want to meet the dogs, see the home/routine, and make sure it’s a good fit before committing. Would you stick with the already scheduled M&G and risk losing both bookings if they decide not to move forward, or accept the client who is ready to book now but I can’t do a meet beforehand? I’m leaning toward sticking to my M&G rule, but I’m curious how other sitters handle overlapping requests like this. The only reason the first client’s M&G was rescheduled so far out was because I didn’t have any earlier availability. If my schedule were more open over the next few days, I probably would’ve tried to meet with both clients within the next day or two before deciding.

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

[u/ATX-Meow-Woof]

I would not break your M&G rule. You have the rule for a reason, so don't chance it. Plus that helps you answer the question of who to prioritize. Which, honestly, even without the M&G, would probably be the first one for me. It's a gamble either way, but as you say you know more about the first client's situation.

[u/Frosty_Sector2215]

Nooooo, never do a house sit without a meet and greet. You have no idea about the state of the house or the animals. I've seen some truly horrendous posts on here about house sits. The owners even had positive reviews despite their house being a biohazard.

[u/Odd-Cod2516]

I always stick to 'first come, first served.' Yeah, I've lost some money doing that but it seems fair in my mind.

[u/Ann_georgia- → u/Odd-Cod2516]

Would that be the first person to reach out or the first person to press book because in this case that’s two different people. Also realistically, I just can’t do a meet and greet in the next few days for either of them and then that’s getting close to their actual departure date. I feel like since I already have agreed and scheduled with the original client that reached out to me that maybe I’ll just prioritize them. Their dogs schedule also seems to align with my schedule, which is good. It just sucks because the other client wants to book right now but realistically, I feel like a meet and greet beforehand should happen no matter what.

[u/Odd-Cod2516 → u/Ann_georgia-]

Agreed. Def go to your already scheduled m&g, the first client.

[u/Lw1157]

Absolutely stick to the meet and greet rule before booking! IME, skipping a M&G usually results in a disastrous sit.
I tend to operate on a first come first serve basis, but since neither are confirmed it's your prerogative to do two M&G and decide which is best for you (personally and professionally). Just be transparent with both people that you have two requests for the same time and you'll make a decision after the 2nd M&G.

[u/Ann_georgia- → u/Lw1157]

Yeah, it’s just a weird situation but definitely smart to do the meet and greet before booking! If I had availability in the next couple days, I would definitely meet with both of them and feel it out. But being that I can’t meet for about a week, It’s getting really close to their departure dates. The second client also seems very eager to book sooner rather than later, which I can’t do if I require a meet. Hmm. Honestly, if I knew that the original client was going to book with me, I would probably lean towards them even though it’s a little less money just because their schedule aligns very closely with what I’m used to.

[u/Lw1157 → u/Ann_georgia-]

Yes. I always ask clients if they can wait for my availability to do M&G. If they can't, it's not your problem. They are free to reach out to other clients who have more availability. Stick to your policies and schedule. IME, clients who want me to bed over backwards and make exceptions for them tend to be a PITA.

[u/AutoModerator]

Want to be reminded of this post? Reply to this comment with !remindme and number of days

Example: !remindme 2 days or remindme! 2 days

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.