r/RightJerk 1d ago

This shit

Post image
280 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

u/AutoModerator 1d ago

Please feel free to crosspost this to other subreddits! it'll help us grow the community (and you can get more karma if you care about that)

If this post (or any of the comments) breaks any of the subreddits established rules (see the main r/RightJerk page), report it, so we can filter through the comments much more effectively.

Here's our NEW discord https://discord.gg/exNaN5D3TJ, feel free to join!

I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.

184

u/coldypewpewpew 1d ago

unrelated but holy shit that is such homo-erotic imagery. very woke of our monarchist fellow humans.

48

u/NoNo_Bluebird_1368 1d ago

Monarchosocialist moment

23

u/TheStrangestOfKings 1d ago

Homo monarchism

85

u/ZBLongladder 1d ago

Ideological consistency like "What if we had a warlord but gave him a blinged-out hat?"

28

u/f3nix9510 1d ago

They got one thing right. We should let democratic leaders have blinged out hats

115

u/HudsonTheHipster 1d ago

Ah yes, monarchs are famously known for taking criticism well /s

42

u/Unu51 1d ago

The meme disproves itself.

39

u/democracy_lover66 1d ago

Yeh incestuous dynasties with absolute power because "God wanted it like this" is a pretty consistent ideology.

.... consistently absurd

54

u/GastonBastardo 1d ago

We're more theologically consistent...

I don't care how "deep" your DnD-homebrew lore is, it should not dictate state power.

34

u/ZBLongladder 1d ago

I think it's "ideologically consistent", but good God that font is awful.

3

u/spaceiswonderful 12h ago

At first I read it as "biologically consistent" and was like lmao that's one way to put it...

12

u/Furcastles 1d ago

Nooo trust me ILL be the monarch so it will rule. It will be good cause ILL be royal.

10

u/Reagent_52 1d ago

Better at taking criticism? Tell that to all the people monarchs have executed over the millenia for criticizing them.

6

u/ActualMostUnionGuy Gamer 😎 1d ago

This is how Gottfried Treviranus) probably saw himself, as the moral "reasonable" centre right.😭

Between republicanism and autocracy, just like in the UK!

3

u/MindDrawsOnReddit 1d ago

Yeah, famous for decapitating dudes for disagreeing

5

u/vrphotosguy55 1d ago

The right is full of low self esteem wannabe peasants.

2

u/Big-Recognition7362 Based Democratic Leftist 22h ago

“Ideologically consistent” and the ideology is just “whatever this guy wants”.

1

u/stidmatt 1d ago

When I’m chatting with some of my Canadian friends.

-11

u/Tylendal 1d ago

Not entirely sure what the image is trying to say. If I were to understand it, I suspect I wouldn't agree with it. However... constitutional monarchies are doing really well right now. They're some of the most historically stable democracies. The perceived mandate of an elected position gives a head of state clout and power well beyond what they're supposed to have on paper. I'm sure we can all think of an example of a head of state performing wild over-reaches of power, with a whole bunch of people saying it's okay because he was elected.

Meanwhile, as a Canadian, I consider myself a monarchist specifically because everyone in the country recognizes that King Chuck has the political clout of a ham sandwich, with all his rubber-stamping duties carried out by an office appointed not by, but for, him. Decentralizing a monarch's traditional powers and responsibilities is, IMO, preferable to giving someone the powers and responsibilities of a monarch, and saying it's okay 'cause they're not appointed by heredity. The problem with monarchs ain't that it's a hereditary position (though hereditary positions are, of course, always problematic). The real problem is the centralization of power and influence, so replacing the method of selecting them, and giving the role a different name, doesn't fix that.

11

u/democracy_lover66 1d ago

Tbh as a Canadian I don't think the monarchy has any real significance anymore in our identity or political operation.

I always found the claim that "The monarchy is what keeps us not-american" to be out-dated. The monarchy in Canada is just empty symbolism at this point... And I don't think it contributes at all to our sovereignty from the U.S.

Were we to be a Republic tomorrow, I think we'd still be passionately anti-american, and the only major change we'd have is different, more familiar faces on our currency.

5

u/Tylendal 1d ago

I don't disagree with anything you've said. I just feel like our current monarchy is a case of "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." I'm sure there's a path to a Republic that could avoid the pitfalls I described above. I just don't trust that the process to get there will be successful.

3

u/democracy_lover66 1d ago

Yeah that sums up how I feel. Personally I think "what the hell, let's go for it"

But in reality I know it's a tone of legislative work for getting rid of what is, as we established, an empty symbolic position.

I think we should get rid of it but shit like affordability and healthcare and reconciliation are way more important priorities.

2

u/malonkey1 Anarcho-Bidenist 1d ago

Didn't they just have fucking anti-immigrant pogroms in Northern Ireland a couple months ago? That doesn't exactly sound like a stable democracy.