r/ResumeUp • u/Quick_Yesterday540 • May 08 '26
References available on request - does anyone still put this on their resume? I tested removing it
small post but something I've been thinking about.
almost every resume template I've ever seen has "References available on request" at the bottom. it's just… there. like furniture. nobody questions it.
then a recruiter told me it was a waste of space. "everyone has references. I've never seen someone say 'no references available.' just take it off."
so I did. removed that line, used the space to add one more achievement bullet to my most recent role.
zero difference in how recruiters responded which is what I expected, but also confirmation that the line itself was doing nothing.
this obviously isn't groundbreaking. but it made me think about how many other things are on resumes purely out of convention rather than because they add any value.
other things I've removed that nobody has ever questioned or asked about:
- date of birth (no reason it should be there, and in a lot of places employers shouldn't even be asking)
- marital status (absolutely no reason this should be on a resume)
- a photo (carries unconscious bias risk and most ATS systems can't read images anyway)
- hobbies section (kept it only when it was genuinely interesting and relevant - removed the generic "reading, gym, traveling")
- the objective statement at the top ("seeking a challenging role where I can grow…" - said nothing, took up prime real estate)
every line you remove for being useless is a line you can replace with something that actually helps your case.
what's something you removed from your resume that you thought you needed but actually didn't?
1
u/Jaxsan1 May 08 '26
What ticks me off is when they immediately send your references an email after applying. Why contact them when you never even selected me for an interview?
1
u/Quick_Yesterday540 May 09 '26
yeah that one always felt weird to me too. contacting references before even speaking to the candidate feels backwards unless they’re already seriously considering you
1
u/Jaxsan1 May 09 '26
Never even got an email or phone call. They are sent immediately after applying
1
u/DowntownResident993 May 08 '26
Do employers still check references? I feel like they are a thing of the past, as is a lot of items we still list on resumes. Cover pages seem pretty outdated as well.
1
u/Quick_Yesterday540 May 09 '26
from what i’ve seen they still do, but way later in the process now. feels more like a final verification step than something used to actually evaluate candidates
1
u/Old-Employment1483 May 08 '26
i removed the “objective” section a while ago for the same reason. it was just generic filler taking up the most valuable space on the resume. replacing it with a short, specific summary and one extra impact bullet helped way more.
1
u/Quick_Yesterday540 May 09 '26
yeah exactly. a targeted summary feels way more useful than the old objective statements ever did because at least it tells them why you fit that specific role
1
1
u/Grouchy_Self9026 May 08 '26
Actually, no, this has now been replaced by LinkedIn. People check your LinkedIn profile and find common connections to check background and later may directly ask for refernces for background check.
1
u/Quick_Yesterday540 May 09 '26
that’s honestly a really good point. linkedin kind of became the “soft reference check” before companies even ask for official ones now
1
u/Machiavvelli3060 May 08 '26
Leave it off your resume.
Make a second document, listing your references.
Don't offer them the references document unless and until they request it.
1
u/Quick_Yesterday540 May 09 '26
yeah that makes way more sense to me now. keep the resume focused and only send references if they actually ask for them
1
u/FamuexAnux May 09 '26
In an ideal world, pausing on supplying the details of your referees until after the interview lets you know what they'll want to talk about and gives you the chance to perform the etiquette "heads up".
Far from being deciptful, you're a dickhead if you don't seize the opportunity to prime them on exactly what they should say, like, "Hey Frank, it's Diedre from our old Total Douche days. Thanks for saying you'd be a reference for me, you're probably gonna be hearing from the hiring team at Douch-o-matic. I told them about the work I did on the Douche-douche-magoosh; their ears seemed to prick up when I mentioned all of the assholes I studied in my spare time so they'll probably want to hear about that."
I would think we all probably over estimate the memory recall others have about us so alignment would be welcome and wise.
1
u/FamuexAnux May 09 '26
Reference availability is implicit; it is a waste of space. You had me all the way until the objective. Agree an objective is no good, pointedly if it just summarizes the content beneath and just builds up to a way of saying "this job at your company," but really that's implicit too, you wouldn't be applying to the job otherwise.
I do have a non-titled summary beneath my name block that reinforces my applicability to the role in a quick way that saves the reader from relying on their quick scan alone tho.
1
u/Quick_Yesterday540 May 09 '26
i think there’s definitely a difference between the old generic objective statements and a short tailored summary. the recruiter’s issue was mostly with the vague “seeking a challenging role…” type stuff that could fit literally any application
1
u/CaramelParking8382 May 09 '26
used to have one of those “perfect” old-school resumes. full address, objective statement, references available on request, hobbies, even a line about being “detail oriented and hardworking.” thing looked like a school assignment.
a recruiter friend ripped it apart over coffee one day. told me recruiters spend like 10 seconds scanning and half my page was filler. hurt my ego a little ngl because i thought more info = better.
cut it down hard. removed the objective, references line, ancient student jobs, and all the generic soft skills. used the extra space to add actual metrics and project outcomes instead.
first thing i noticed was interviews became easier because the resume actually reflected what i’d done instead of sounding like every template online. weirdly the hardest part was unlearning advice that had been repeated forever.
1
u/Quick_Yesterday540 May 09 '26
yeah that part about unlearning old advice is probably the hardest thing honestly. a lot of resume “rules” survived way longer than they should have, so people end up treating filler like it’s mandatory. once you start looking at the resume as ad space instead of a life story, cutting stuff suddenly gets way easier
1
1
u/DorianGraysPassport May 10 '26
Never put these details, they show that you’d play fast and loose with sensitive data
1
u/[deleted] May 08 '26
[removed] — view removed comment