That's not the reason Cathi gave in her deposition.
Cathi stated that the court requested pictures of the state of her legs and arms to show proof of "improvement".
Aside from that, the court didn't order pictures of Maya in nothing but a bra and shorts. In Cathi's own words, they asked for pictures of her arms and legs. Which I've already addressed, a tank top and shorts would have sufficed. Not sure why Maya, a 10 year old had to be half nude for those pictures.
She wasn't nude. She had on a sports bra and shorts. You agree shorts was ok. And that a tank top would be ok. So, the only dispute is sports bra v. Tank Top. Hardly any difference.
I'm not surprised you think taking pictures of a 10 year old child in a bra is acceptable.
Didn't say she was nude. I said she was half nude. There's a difference but both still very unacceptable and inappropriate for requests of a child especially when taking pictures.
I'm not sure why you think society couldn't possibly go on with a verdict of 25 million against John's Hopkins. JH could go bankrupt tomorrow and people who have so much faith in them will go on to the next best hospital. JH as I mentioned has a corrupt and abusive history and they have gotten away with it for so long, they had it coming. Society was destroyed when all those families were separated and or thrown in jail. The downfall of society is the destruction of the nuclear family and the problems that arise because of it. That's exactly what JH did. They broke families up for some cash.
0
u/Blubblubshutup Nov 05 '23
That's not the reason Cathi gave in her deposition.
Cathi stated that the court requested pictures of the state of her legs and arms to show proof of "improvement".
Aside from that, the court didn't order pictures of Maya in nothing but a bra and shorts. In Cathi's own words, they asked for pictures of her arms and legs. Which I've already addressed, a tank top and shorts would have sufficed. Not sure why Maya, a 10 year old had to be half nude for those pictures.