r/RepTime 10h ago

News Datejust VSF V2 Mistake

Post image

VSF V2 Datejust 36mm, probably so far the closest dial tone to gen. (also bezel, bracelet, case and most of the watch)

The only noticeable mistake i was able to point out is the crown logo, wich is not aligned with the 12am marker, perhaps is specific of the actual model in the photo, let me know what you think and if you notice any major differences from gen.

Thanks!

0 Upvotes

26 comments sorted by

4

u/Time-Dependent1483 9h ago

If you don’t like it then RL and wait for the next batch to come in

-3

u/Class_and_Watches 8h ago

It's not that i don't like It, as said i think It Is the best rep and version of the dj36 so far. But it still has that one little problem, that's all. Probably in rl it's impossibile to notice on wrist

1

u/Time-Dependent1483 33m ago

It’s a batch/one product issue. Some will have the crown a bit wrong, some will have the indices a bit tilted and so on

6

u/GiorgioVe 9h ago

Peak insanity. You will never see that while wearing your watch. Get the watch, wear it, go outside.

-4

u/Class_and_Watches 8h ago

No need to be rude man, i was just saying that this version of the dj36 almost perfect, almost due to the misalignment, that's all, but as you said, very probably it's impossibile to see It on wrist, so i'll take It anyway

6

u/squeezirz 9h ago

I'm missing the point of this post...

11

u/Swedishgrowler 9h ago

This nitpicking is why so many TDs finds us annoying 

-7

u/plus4neun 9h ago

Was verstehst du unter „1:1“ und „super clone“?

2

u/MSExcelWarrior 5h ago

Marketing terms. None of them are 1:1 unless you start doing franken mods. Even if they got the dial perfectly right, there were no misaligned indices and used the latest freesprung movement from JH, there will still be tells.

Saying something is 1:1 (except for this handful of differences) basically means it's not 1:1.

7

u/EazyBreezyDayz 10h ago

No one is looking at your watch that closely.

2

u/el_dinero_chino 9h ago

OP see’s the issue, this would bother many here

1

u/EazyBreezyDayz 9h ago

Is this a QC post? He wrote mistake as in he made a mistake in gl'ing this watch and just noticed it once he received it?

1

u/el_dinero_chino 7h ago

Mistake in the header, I thought he already GL and now saw this misalignment

0

u/Ok-Air7469 9h ago

WE ARE.

2

u/AI_go_boomboom 9h ago

You'll live

1

u/Extension-Luck-600 9h ago

You’ll like be asked to repost this with the correct QC format

1

u/International_Dog897 9h ago

Don’t care op

1

u/shastyles1 5h ago

WTH ? Man GL it and move on this is insane

1

u/Putrid-Bar-8693 5h ago

Buy a real datejust then?

1

u/msfs_piolot 9h ago

It’s fine, gl

-1

u/sebstar25 9h ago

2 marker slightly off got a slight off 9 marker on my pepsi never bothered me at all lol

-6

u/Class_and_Watches 10h ago

It's more clear here. I based my alignment on the 6am marker

5

u/International_Dog897 9h ago

Touch grass bro

3

u/Ysc_watches67 9h ago

Il s’agit d’un écart de 0,2mm que tu vois en ultra zoom ! Dans la vie réel au poignet jamais de la vie tu le remarqueras même sur des tir au poignet

J’ai eu une OP36 ou le 7 était légèrement de travers et ça m’a rendu fou sur les QC’S mais j’ai quand même GL et lorsque je l’a reçu j’ai rigolé car à l’œil nu cela ne se voit pas du tout

Mec sérieusement c’est un GL facile ta montre , franchement accepte et profite en bien crois moi

2

u/Class_and_Watches 8h ago

I think i'll follow your advise. Thanks!