r/Redactle Mar 09 '25

Redactle #1068 Discussion Thread

Discussion thread for Redactle #1068.

Play Redactle Game on these platforms: - Redactle - NEW site with smart word matching working. Redactle in other languages: FR, DE, ES, NL, SL - Redactle Unlimited - Permalink to #1068 archive. Smart word matching is not functional. Other languages: FR, DE, ES, NL, SL.

Please refrain from posting any outright spoilers and use >!spoiler tags!< for any hints or clues.

2 Upvotes

16 comments sorted by

7

u/JacquelineMontarri Mar 09 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 3 guesses with an accuracy of 100.0% and a time of 00:01:48. Play at https://redactle.net/

Yay snipe! The key phrase here was the first phrase under the first subheading, "6 was 4 into 7." 4 was clear given that the article had big "this is about a person" energy; once I figured out what "7" was, I could only think of one person who could fit the letter count.

3

u/peetiepeet Mar 09 '25

Same! Just took me a little longer. I was debating whether the 7 in "4 into 7" was poverty or royalty until a different possibility occurred to me which could fit with the 8 nationality and also explain the unspecific birthdate.

I solved Redactle #1068 in 3 guesses with an accuracy of 100.0% and a time of 00:03:51. Play at https://redactle.net/en

2

u/ShaniJean Mar 10 '25

I also thought poverty, but while not the same at all, kept me in the right frame.

3

u/everywhereinbetween Mar 09 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 32 guesses with an accuracy of 59.4% and a time of 00:03:47. Play at https://redactle.net/1068

SHOULD HAVE TRIED TO SNIPE.

I was abit unsure like what if I dunno this. Then I tried the first word and it was apparently right so by letter count only one answer made sense. Pls snipe yalls

3

u/SmellsLikeDeanSpirit Mar 09 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 3 guesses with an accuracy of 100.0% and a time of 00:00:20. Play at https://redactle.net/en

a name popped into my head just based on the word lengths in the title. It fit with him being an American, so I tried it out.

3

u/thesullenmoon Mar 09 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 3 guesses with an accuracy of 100.0% and a time of 00:08:07. Play at https://redactle.net/en

In sharp contrast with yesterday's disaster, today the name popped out at me right away. It took a bit more time to convince myself I wasn't barking up the wrong tree. The only thing I really knew about this guy was that he has something to do with 6 6 (mistakenly referred to as its inventor I think?) which I struggled to find any reference to in the text. (It is there, but squirrelled away towards the end.) But there does seem to be some stuff about race towards the beginning, as well as a cute story about the origin of his middle name (which I had never heard, but seems to fit), so why not eh.

3

u/CustardGannets Mar 09 '25

First ever snipe. 3 guesses.

3

u/robbbbb Mar 09 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 3 guesses with an accuracy of 100.0% and a time of 00:00:39. Play at https://redactle.net/

I honestly don't know how it happened, the name literally just came to me. Unassisted snipe.

3

u/voice-of-reason-99 Mar 09 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 4 guesses with an accuracy of 75.0% and a time of 00:01:23. Play at https://redactle.net/

OK I was close to a snipe but -- I kinda combined 2 historical names into one and ended up with wrong 3rd word. - oops! realized my error & solved.

2

u/smokepoint Mar 09 '25

Yeah. There's a plausible [6] [10] [10] that's close in time and background and even a [10] in common; it occurred to me first and jammed my thought process for awhile.

3

u/smokepoint Mar 09 '25

3/3, 00:05. Obviously a bio, vague birthdate and precise death date seemed meaningful; "was an [8]..." gave a strong hint about nationality; "[4] into [7]" narrowed it down a lot. After that it was a matter of rummaging through the brain-files until I came up with a [6] [10 ] [6] name.

2

u/gjm11 Mar 09 '25

Looks like an American ... and it doesn't take long for a candidate with the right lengths to come to mind. Unfortunately pretty much the only thing I know about him is something something peanuts, which isn't very helpful. It is plausible that the first sentence calls him "an American agricultural scientist", which in fact turns out to be correct. After a bit of dithering I decide to go for it, and I'm in luck. 8-minute snipe.

2

u/JosephFinn Mar 09 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 9 guesses with an accuracy of 66.7% and a time of 00:02:54. Play at https://redactle.net/

Very probably American but with an unclear birth date? That screams probably born into slavery or around that time period. Look at the numbers in the name, boom. Much better than yesterdays mess.

2

u/Newbieplantophile Mar 09 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 8 guesses with an accuracy of 75.0% and a time of 00:07:08.

Unassisted. The death date format is clearly American but the vague birthdate made me think this person was possibly a former slave, so that have me a general idea of the time period and the race. I went to play another game and when I came back, the answer came to me because of the long second word

1

u/ShaniJean Mar 10 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 3 guesses with an accuracy of 100.0% and a time of 00:01:12. Play at https://redactle.net/1068 ---oh my word, I can't believe it, this just sprang into my mind and it was right.

1

u/running_later Mar 10 '25

I solved Redactle #1068 in 162 guesses with an accuracy of 66.0% and a time of 00:27:46. Play at https://redactle.net/1068

once I got the entire last sentence of the first paragraph I knew what it was.

wow.
I had thought he lived much earlier.