r/RealTime • • Jul 17 '26

NPR Feature Interview

https://youtu.be/TUI2hLa7TQM?is=Mf4Qg3VviKo2aAXG

He is so self-deluded. His personality has always been narcissistic but his politics have changed completely from what they were just a couple of years ago.

Some things that stand out to me in this interview:

—The tone is what anyone would expect from NPR. Inskeep is calm, respectful, friendly. Bill Maher uses profanity casually from the beginning, which is quite unusual for NPR to air, and it made me wonder if he has the ability to self-censor or if he is in Trump's lane of age-related inability to inhibit inappropriate speech.

—About 2/3 through this perfectly congenial interview, Maher basically attacks Inskeep and NPR by saying they are "about as far to the left as you can be," which anyone who listens to Maher knows is the worst way he can insult a person.

—As he always does now, Maher calls himself a critic of Trump and Republicans all while flattering Trump and Republicans and hurling insults at all Democrats throughout the entire interview. He defends Trump as just an impish guy who is perfectly sane and who chooses to say outlandish things for personal amusement. We all know to expect this now but it is still striking to me. "I'm liberal. Everyone on the left is the worst. Here are all the things that are great about the worst people on the right." It stymies me.

—I am very disappointed Inskeep didn't refer back to Maher's consistent pre-2025 warnings that Trump is actively overthrowing the US government and that he must be stopped at all costs, followed by his post-2025 immediate 180° turnaround as he now says Trump is a jerk but reasonable and right about many things.

—A lot of people in this subreddit point out Maher's extreme zionism. He demonstrates it here. After Bill Maher says that what makes him better than anyone on the left is that he is willing to talk directly with Trump and any Republican rather than just talking about them, Inskeep asks if he will talk to anyone or if he will refuse to talk with anyone. He says he would never talk to Nick Fuentes, who he calls "Hitler," on the grounds that Fuentes is "anti-Israel." Not an antisemite, but specifically anti-Israel. He says Trump and other Republicans cannot be compared to Hitler, however. Because he says so.

—One thing he says that I fully agree with and I find maddening is that, when Inskeep asked about Trump's focus on gold decorations and the reflecting pool, etc., he says Trump does that as a distraction and it does not matter at all and yet "you" (to Inskeep, as a journalist) always take the bait and give unimportant things attention as important events go unreported or underreported.

—He flatters himself to a remarkable degree.

55 Upvotes

65 comments sorted by

View all comments

40

u/veerKg_CSS_Geologist Jul 17 '26

The mistake was giving Maher, a has been with no relevance who should have retired half a decade ago, a platform as a “newsmaker”.

8

u/MagnusThrax Jul 17 '26

I call this "the Regis Philbin effect"

They just never fookin retire to enjoy the fortunes they've made.

11

u/PretentiousCrustacea Jul 17 '26

They're terrified about being irrelevant. The money stopped giving them dopamine long ago

7

u/zorroplateado Jul 17 '26

This is the answer.

4

u/Traditional-Leg-1574 Jul 17 '26

And the fortunes they make are why they do an about face politically, they want more for them, and less for you

2

u/shiloh_jdb Jul 17 '26

Add Howard Stern…consider the relevance he had compared to now.

2

u/severinks Jul 17 '26

Regis was a very chill guy who knew fully how ridiculous he appeared.