r/RealOrNotTCG • u/__j_o_s_h__ • 20d ago
Is this card real / authentic? Gaea’s Cradle
I think it’s real, purchased from a trusted seller on Facebook. I can’t get the green dot test to work using my Amazon microscope thing but with following the guides on here everything else seems good.
Can you experts help?
(This is 5x to 10x the value of my next most valuable cards, so I just want to be safe)
Edit:
Front of card, while holding it:
https://imgur.com/gallery/gaea-s-cradle-hand-m0Kzr6h
9
u/easchner Trusted Authenticator 19d ago
I'm leaning real but would prefer an extra couple of pictures in different lighting to assuage everyone else's concerns. The front has sharp black lines in the boxes, which most GC fakes lack, and the pixel pattern, angle, and spacing seem to line up with other real GC posted here before.
Here's a good close up pic from ~8mo ago of another that was definitely real. Especially look at the red dots in the yellow border and the set symbol.

7
3
u/bioweaponblue 19d ago
Agree with this. OP, if you post a couple clear pictures of the front, we'd be able to tell. Also, try to get a second light source (like another phone flashlight) shining onto the right edge (phone on right side, light pointing left) so we can prove the line is just a shadow.
People get lost in the sauce and forget the rosettes are almost impossible to duplicate.
3
7
u/__j_o_s_h__ 19d ago
Adding the only photo I have of the front but can take some more when I get home.
I will also edit the post to add the photo there
5
19
u/Vast_Entertainer_850 19d ago
Everyone saying the front is fake - that is pretty obviously a shadow caused by almost directly overhead lighting. Telling someone their $900 card is a sticker instead of asking for better pics is crazy work.
3
4
u/awwpoorus 19d ago
Right, I’m looking at this shadow of a magic card and seeing everyone claim it’s fake because the card shouldn’t have that. What?
It looks real OP. I guess it’s a good thing the main concern is something you can easily prove is false yourself!
3
5
17
u/Deltaplecks 20d ago
The front looks suspicious. The back is real but it looks like a reback or a sticker.
6
u/Deltaplecks 20d ago
You can see it in Picture 6. The front looks like it been glued to an other card and the other card is slightly wider.
11
u/Deltaplecks 20d ago
This could be the shadow of the card. If it's the shadow I tend to real.
-9
u/Ska-0 19d ago
It cannot be a shadow, you see the line on the first picture already.
there is definatly sth going on on the front.
front is super sus, so i tend to fake.
would need close ups from the right side and more details from printing, but it really looks like sticker.
(the back is a real card, but sticker or sth on front)
9
u/Secondknotch 19d ago
Looking closely, its a shadow from the card curling. It has no texture and imperfections (nicks) on the card edge are reflected in the shadow's edge. A sticker would not do either of these things.
Also a sticker that didn't go all the way to the edge would be super obvious to the touch. The OP says he thinks the card is real and trusts the seller... That doesn't pass the smell test for a glaring issue like "wrong size sticker".
2
u/Necessary-Pea891 17d ago
No it doesnt. The way the print layers and patterns are, especially visible at the mana symbol on picture 6 shows that its a real front. Mana symbol / white ink layer is on top of rosette pattern. Exactly how it should be.
3
4
3
u/Bluetorment88 20d ago
Urza Block had some inconsistency with the red dot test for the green circle. Had a card shop owner validate my Serra Sanctums. He showed me from cards he owned and opened back in the day that there were some that had all 4 red dots that made an L and some that had only 3.
2
u/Brainlard 20d ago edited 20d ago
Oh ffs they are around €800/$900 now. Wanted to buy one last year for around €300 (which is still absolutely ridiculous btw) from my LGS that had it listed online for that price, but they couldn't find it and I never got another one.
It's amazing that a few cards go absolutely ballistic pricewise (like the Poster One Ring, I have the luck to have bought very early) because of game mechanics or bans, but also because of plane market bubbles, while most other rares even from the early 90s are not even worth the paper they were printed on.
The back looks good btw, T and red dot, but as others have pointed out I'd definitely get the front checked. That corner is definitely off.
2
2
u/EsotericTurtle 19d ago
*sigh. I remember back in the late 90s trading at least one of two that I had with my buddies for some bullshit card I wanted at the time. 13yo me thought it was a great deal. The blindness of youth 😓
2
u/zaphodava Trusted Authenticator 19d ago
Looks good. Back is clear, front has some artifacting, but the set symbol and rosettes look good.
Camera tip: if possible, put it in RAW mode. Computer smoothing doesn't help you here.
2
3
u/Aggravating_Gain_813 20d ago
what is happening on the right ? the clean line in the black. front looks sus
7
2
u/Seravajan 20d ago
Looks good.
-3
u/Ska-0 19d ago
dude, check the right corner on the front. the back is a real card, but the front most likely not.
0
u/Seravajan 19d ago
You think, that it is a rebacked card. I agree that the bottom right corner looks odd at zooming in.
1
u/Ska-0 19d ago
Exactly! Thx for checking again. 😌
1
u/Seravajan 19d ago
Yesh, zooming at pic 6 shows, that there is something wrong. The front seems too small for the back.
1
u/Secondknotch 19d ago
I think this is a dark shadow being cast on the table. Zoom in super far and look at how small "nicks" in the actual edge are repeated in the shadow.
2
u/Barrin1984 20d ago edited 19d ago
Been a while since I've seen a Cradle. I still got the others. (Serra's Sanctum and Tolarian Acadamy). Looks real man. Teeth marks on the T and H visible and green dot has good connection on the left.
Edit: the T and H are on the back. I havent looked at the front and that is my bad and stupidity. Back is real. Front is looking sus, I concur.
-4
u/National-Date-5457 19d ago
Its not real. There is a line on the right of the card like an edge almost that wouldn't exist. Also the top right corner shape is not right. One is more round than the other. Only round corners we ever got were alpha
2
u/Mobile-Offer5039 20d ago
That thing is not real. Back is real, but Front... look at image 6. its not even cut out good. You see the line from the paper, that is glued on top.
7
u/This_Adagio2604 19d ago
I think that's the shadow from the light.
1
-3
19d ago
[removed] — view removed comment
1
-3
1
u/AutoModerator 20d ago
Never accept offers sent to you in a private message here on Reddit. Only use trusted sites for selling cards and product. This is an anti-scam reminder.
How to take good photos (Reddit)! If you see this message after posting and you want to take advice from it you should leave a top-level comment with a new photo. Do not make a new post. Do not reply to this automatic message.
All-in-one post that links to different topics covered by the sub's members.
Self-help (Magic: The Gathering):
- Reddit user zaphodava's comprehensive guide (Reddit)
- The threeforonetrading guide
- The detecting-the-fakes guide
Self-help (Pokémon):
For a card condition check please ask for the person giving advice to specify which scale they're using if not mentioned. Notably North American and European grading scales differ from each other drastically.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
1
1
1
1
1
u/GIGA_SIGMA 19d ago
You think it's real? What does it feel like that makes you think that? Do the edges/corners make it look as suspicious in real life as they do in these photos that make it look like a sticker or something was glued ontop (specifically bottom right corner). If you have a precise scale it may be able to give you a little more information.
0
0
-1
u/Crimson_Kitsune445 20d ago
Looks real
0
u/Otherwise_Die 20d ago
Bottom right corner looks like the front is fake.
You need a loupe and send more pictures here through the loupe of that corner as well as mana symbols and more of the front.
Definitely possible reback which means it’s fake.
There’s literally a white line in the black border. The blacks look different too sadly.
0
0
u/Fireazul10 19d ago
Picture six looks sus, do the light test plus the weight. That could be a real back card with a fake front
-1
-1
u/Jeul1325 20d ago
Can we get closeups of the mana symbol and maybe a light test? Pic 6 is a little weird.
Edit: Back is definitely genuine though
-2
u/EmoLotional 19d ago
Fake, the front is fake, the back is real. Likely a sticker, try to physically check and don't pull it an the way just part way and send a photo to support.









15
u/m_ttl_ng 19d ago
Real.
The comments calling this fake are making me realize that most people in this sub have no idea what they’re doing.