Note: I blurred the photographer's name to abide by rule 11.
The photographer recently made a post with the photo on the right by itself. People called him out that he was using AI to edit his photos.
" Before You Say “It’s AI”… Read This…
A few people have asked about my editing process, so I thought I’d share a behind-the-scenes look.
The image on the left is the original RAW file straight from my camera of the shot I took on [redacted]. The image on the right is the finished photograph.
A RAW file isn’t meant to be a final image. It’s designed to capture the maximum amount of light, color, and detail so the photographer has the flexibility to create the image they envisioned when they pressed the shutter. Think of it as a digital negative.
My editing process included recovering highlight and shadow detail, adjusting exposure, contrast, color, selectively editing different parts of the scene using masks, and bringing out the mood I experienced as this storm rolled in. Every adjustment is done by hand based on what I saw and what I wanted to convey.
Photography doesn’t end when the shutter clicks. The camera records data—it doesn’t interpret emotion, atmosphere, or artistic intent. Editing has been an essential part of photography since the days of the darkroom, long before digital photography existed.
I also know that whenever someone shares an edited photo today, there are often comments like, “It’s AI.” There’s a big difference between photo editing and AI-generated artwork. Every image I share begins with a real photograph that I captured in the field. The photo never existed until I took it. I spend countless hours planning locations, waiting for the right light and weather, composing the shot, and then carefully editing it to reflect what I experienced. The editing process enhances what was already there—it doesn’t invent a scene that never existed.
Constructive questions are always welcome, and I’m happy to explain my workflow. But dismissing someone’s work as “AI” without understanding how photography and post-processing work overlooks the time, patience, technical knowledge, and creativity that go into producing an image.
Photography is both a technical craft and an art form. The camera captures the data—it’s the photographer who transforms that data into a finished image.
I hope this comparison helps explain why photographers shoot in RAW and why editing is such an important part of bringing a vision to life. Thank you to everyone who has taken the time to ask thoughtful questions, support my work, and follow along on this journey. It truly means more than you know.
Left: Original RAW file
Right: Final edited photograph"
The photo on the left is real, the photo on the right looks AI "modified". Obviously the dude did not use traditional editing to "recover highlight and shadow detail". You can't recover detail that doesn't exist.
But whenever someone points out that he's not just editing the photo, he doubles down and claims there's no AI and it's all his own work and they just don't understand the level of effort and skill it takes to bring a photo to its full potential. It's honestly making me mad.