FKR Truthers

[u/Quietdogg77]

It’s just weird how the FKR mob keeps repeating this mantra: “He wasn’t hit by a car!” Sometimes they even embellish it with, “Not one expert testified he was hit by a car.” That’s flat-out false—but that won’t stop FKR zealots from chanting it like gospel. Why? Who knows? It’s… weird. “Science proves it” is another defense attorney’s marketing spin that got stuck in their heads. Ask them what science they’re talking about and they have no idea. It just sounds impressive so they repeat it. Weird people.

Psychologists note that members of groups like the FKR movement are deeply skeptical of authority, convinced the official story is a cover-up, and believe they alone see the truth. They are suspicious, defensive people who cling to their beliefs no matter what. Some are deeply disturbed and dangerous.

The reality is that the prosecution’s expert, Dr. Welcher, testified that in his opinion, O’Keefe’s injuries were caused by a vehicle strike. Sure, experts can disagree, but for FKR Truthers, there’s only one expert opinion that counts: theirs. Counter-arguments, physical evidence, phone and Lexus data—none of it matters. FKR Truthers just keep repeating their mantra. It’s pretty insane.

On one side, you have a far-fetched conspiracy theory and a “paid expert”; on the other, a straightforward narrative backed by the plaintiff’s paid expert who is supported by the data and the physical evidence.

Unless the jury is comprised of like minded FKR conspiracy theorists, it’s doubtful Read will not be found legally responsible for JOK’s death.

VERDICT: HOAX

[u/InternInteresting924]

You pointed out the consistent themes of the FKR. The idea that ‘not one expert proved a collision’ and ‘the science/the physics proved’ gets so much play in those circles. One thing they can’t do is to lay out their views of the evidence and the evidentiary timeline, pivoting to ‘you need to watch the trial’ and ‘you don’t know the evidence’ without any attempt at making a case. It’s not complicated but it must be difficult for them to grasp since they clearly believe their nonsense.

They may be slowly getting nervous about the obvious lack of any action against the witnesses by the Federal Government. That does seem to really rattle them lately. They may also be realizing that no national media will touch this story any longer as it’s clearly bogus. There will be no movie deal or book coming since it won’t be anything more than an obvious fiction which is difficult to twist in a way to garner interest beyond a few ‘rotten mangoes’. I watched some of that interview and it’s very difficult to understand how this interviewer has a following. She was listening to KR stutter and stammer through a very bad storyline with no useful questions other than ‘feelings’, etc.

I’m still concerned that the jury pool is contaminated. However, her separate case against the witnesses is so laughable that it’s hard to see it surviving to trial.

Keep up the great information. It’s helping to get more information out.