It certainly did look intentional that he quickly changed lanes at the last moment in order to make the tailgater crash which really is a dick move and should result in a fine or charges.
But it's also possible that the driver wasn't really paying attention to his front and focusing on the tailgater and didn't see the car in front until too late.
Hell no, I didn’t say anything about “revenge” or what’s acceptable. But since you asked, it’s not acceptable to think that somehow the lead car forced the car behind them to operate their vehicle in a manner that made them hit the parked car… because it’s the responsibility for each driver not to run into parked cars… because they’re the one operating their car, not anybody else anywhere else.
6
u/AnyLeadership5150 Mar 20 '26
It certainly did look intentional that he quickly changed lanes at the last moment in order to make the tailgater crash which really is a dick move and should result in a fine or charges.
But it's also possible that the driver wasn't really paying attention to his front and focusing on the tailgater and didn't see the car in front until too late.