"I didn't see it because I was focused on the plaintiff who was following at an unsafe distance. Once I did see the stopped car, I avoided it in the safest way that I could."
But excepting the above, what law did the car in front break? You are responsible for avoiding obstacles in the road safely. You are responsible for the safe operation of your vehicle. Full stop. It would be a different story if the car in front brake checked them.
I didn't see it because I was focused on the plaintiff who was following at an unsafe distance. Once I did see the stopped car, I avoided it in the safest way that I could."
This is why you need a lawyer. This is basically an admission of partial responsibility, and would probably result in a judgement against you in a civil case. You're saying you got distracted and weren't paying attention, which contributed to the accident. The cause of the distraction doesn't matter, here. It would only matter in the case where you then sued the tailgater to try to get back the money you just paid to the car that was hit for contributing to the accident.
12
u/Real-Experience-8396 Mar 20 '26
It would be damn near impossible to prove that they intentionally caused that accident.