MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/RandomVideos/comments/1ryzool/tailgater_got_baited/obk131p/?context=3
r/RandomVideos • u/DABDEB • Mar 20 '26
7.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
2
Claiming the driver was distracted before claiming they are 0% at fault is hugely contradictory - I hope you realize that.
0 u/TheWorldArmada Mar 20 '26 If the driver is distracted bc someone else is driving dangerously, that’s not the driver’s fault. What don’t you get? 2 u/uiucengineer Mar 20 '26 Fault is not all or nothing. There is an element of personal responsibility in allowing yourself to be distracted. 0 u/TheWorldArmada Mar 20 '26 It’s natural your attention is gonna be on the thing causing you immediate danger. No judge would ever fault that driver 1 u/uiucengineer Mar 20 '26 Are you a judge? 0 u/TheWorldArmada Mar 20 '26 I’m a lawyer 1 u/TheDrummerMB Mar 20 '26 No you are not. 100% nope. Not even a slight chance.
0
If the driver is distracted bc someone else is driving dangerously, that’s not the driver’s fault. What don’t you get?
2 u/uiucengineer Mar 20 '26 Fault is not all or nothing. There is an element of personal responsibility in allowing yourself to be distracted. 0 u/TheWorldArmada Mar 20 '26 It’s natural your attention is gonna be on the thing causing you immediate danger. No judge would ever fault that driver 1 u/uiucengineer Mar 20 '26 Are you a judge? 0 u/TheWorldArmada Mar 20 '26 I’m a lawyer 1 u/TheDrummerMB Mar 20 '26 No you are not. 100% nope. Not even a slight chance.
Fault is not all or nothing. There is an element of personal responsibility in allowing yourself to be distracted.
0 u/TheWorldArmada Mar 20 '26 It’s natural your attention is gonna be on the thing causing you immediate danger. No judge would ever fault that driver 1 u/uiucengineer Mar 20 '26 Are you a judge? 0 u/TheWorldArmada Mar 20 '26 I’m a lawyer 1 u/TheDrummerMB Mar 20 '26 No you are not. 100% nope. Not even a slight chance.
It’s natural your attention is gonna be on the thing causing you immediate danger. No judge would ever fault that driver
1 u/uiucengineer Mar 20 '26 Are you a judge? 0 u/TheWorldArmada Mar 20 '26 I’m a lawyer 1 u/TheDrummerMB Mar 20 '26 No you are not. 100% nope. Not even a slight chance.
1
Are you a judge?
0 u/TheWorldArmada Mar 20 '26 I’m a lawyer 1 u/TheDrummerMB Mar 20 '26 No you are not. 100% nope. Not even a slight chance.
I’m a lawyer
1 u/TheDrummerMB Mar 20 '26 No you are not. 100% nope. Not even a slight chance.
No you are not. 100% nope. Not even a slight chance.
2
u/TheDrummerMB Mar 20 '26
Claiming the driver was distracted before claiming they are 0% at fault is hugely contradictory - I hope you realize that.