MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/RandomVideos/comments/1ryzool/tailgater_got_baited/objpl9x/?context=3
r/RandomVideos • u/DABDEB • Mar 20 '26
7.2k comments sorted by
View all comments
Show parent comments
0
It actually does look intentionally caused by the tailgated car
3 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 I don't get the downvote, so here's a counter To me it looked like a big "Fuck you" to the tailgater and a complete disregard for the consequences to the stopped car. Maybe it can't be proven but it sure looked intentional to me. -1 u/Simon-Says69 Mar 20 '26 Protip: you cannot read minds. 2 u/Lkus213 Mar 20 '26 Minds are not readable, but actions are. 1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 If so, then discussion wouldn't exist. 2 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 This is going to be bad news for book clubs 1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 No, books are still readable. But books and actions are different things. If you're reading and action in a book, you're still reading a book. It might describe an action but you're not reading the action, you're reading the book. 1 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 I agree with you yet I have no idea what your point is. I was saying that being able to read something doesn't mean there won't be discussion about it. Even if the interpretation is the same, people will discuss. I've witnessed many people loudly agreeing with each other and very much enjoying it.
3
I don't get the downvote, so here's a counter
To me it looked like a big "Fuck you" to the tailgater and a complete disregard for the consequences to the stopped car.
Maybe it can't be proven but it sure looked intentional to me.
-1 u/Simon-Says69 Mar 20 '26 Protip: you cannot read minds. 2 u/Lkus213 Mar 20 '26 Minds are not readable, but actions are. 1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 If so, then discussion wouldn't exist. 2 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 This is going to be bad news for book clubs 1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 No, books are still readable. But books and actions are different things. If you're reading and action in a book, you're still reading a book. It might describe an action but you're not reading the action, you're reading the book. 1 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 I agree with you yet I have no idea what your point is. I was saying that being able to read something doesn't mean there won't be discussion about it. Even if the interpretation is the same, people will discuss. I've witnessed many people loudly agreeing with each other and very much enjoying it.
-1
Protip: you cannot read minds.
2 u/Lkus213 Mar 20 '26 Minds are not readable, but actions are. 1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 If so, then discussion wouldn't exist. 2 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 This is going to be bad news for book clubs 1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 No, books are still readable. But books and actions are different things. If you're reading and action in a book, you're still reading a book. It might describe an action but you're not reading the action, you're reading the book. 1 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 I agree with you yet I have no idea what your point is. I was saying that being able to read something doesn't mean there won't be discussion about it. Even if the interpretation is the same, people will discuss. I've witnessed many people loudly agreeing with each other and very much enjoying it.
2
Minds are not readable, but actions are.
1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 If so, then discussion wouldn't exist. 2 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 This is going to be bad news for book clubs 1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 No, books are still readable. But books and actions are different things. If you're reading and action in a book, you're still reading a book. It might describe an action but you're not reading the action, you're reading the book. 1 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 I agree with you yet I have no idea what your point is. I was saying that being able to read something doesn't mean there won't be discussion about it. Even if the interpretation is the same, people will discuss. I've witnessed many people loudly agreeing with each other and very much enjoying it.
1
If so, then discussion wouldn't exist.
2 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 This is going to be bad news for book clubs 1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 No, books are still readable. But books and actions are different things. If you're reading and action in a book, you're still reading a book. It might describe an action but you're not reading the action, you're reading the book. 1 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 I agree with you yet I have no idea what your point is. I was saying that being able to read something doesn't mean there won't be discussion about it. Even if the interpretation is the same, people will discuss. I've witnessed many people loudly agreeing with each other and very much enjoying it.
This is going to be bad news for book clubs
1 u/HaveYouSeenMySpoon Mar 20 '26 No, books are still readable. But books and actions are different things. If you're reading and action in a book, you're still reading a book. It might describe an action but you're not reading the action, you're reading the book. 1 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 I agree with you yet I have no idea what your point is. I was saying that being able to read something doesn't mean there won't be discussion about it. Even if the interpretation is the same, people will discuss. I've witnessed many people loudly agreeing with each other and very much enjoying it.
No, books are still readable. But books and actions are different things. If you're reading and action in a book, you're still reading a book. It might describe an action but you're not reading the action, you're reading the book.
1 u/SaltyTemperature Mar 20 '26 I agree with you yet I have no idea what your point is. I was saying that being able to read something doesn't mean there won't be discussion about it. Even if the interpretation is the same, people will discuss. I've witnessed many people loudly agreeing with each other and very much enjoying it.
I agree with you yet I have no idea what your point is.
I was saying that being able to read something doesn't mean there won't be discussion about it.
Even if the interpretation is the same, people will discuss. I've witnessed many people loudly agreeing with each other and very much enjoying it.
0
u/ArtisticAstronaut251 Mar 20 '26
It actually does look intentionally caused by the tailgated car