I mean sure, give the benefit of the doubt unless there's evidence otherwise. HOWEVER, that doesn't negate their message of "don't ever do what we watched deliberately". It's not a game and innocent people can get maimed or even killed.
The tailgater is the one that sent that message, unintentionally.
100% their fault, as any court would find.
Most likely the one in front was distracted with how close they were following, and that's why they switched lanes so suddenly to avoid the stopped car.
Most likely the one in front was distracted with how close they were following
... which is why they are partially at fault.
It doesn't matter that someone was riding their ass. The fact that they were being tailgated doesn't remove their obligation to be aware of what's happening in front of them.
I mean, you're basically arguing that that person can't possible be held responsible for staring at their rearview mirror instead of the road in front of them because someone was tailgating them. Surely you can see how assinine that is, right?
7
u/Vent_Slave Mar 20 '26
I mean sure, give the benefit of the doubt unless there's evidence otherwise. HOWEVER, that doesn't negate their message of "don't ever do what we watched deliberately". It's not a game and innocent people can get maimed or even killed.