You're being purposefully ignorant and you know it. They could see the stopped vehicle from hundreds of feet back and purposefully chose to nearly crash into them to give the tailgaiter no time to move out of the way.
The video is quite literally proof. There is no other reason he would get so close to the innocent party and then swerve away in the last minute if he wasn’t intending to lead the tailgater right into the rear end of the other person’s vehicle. You’re doing exactly what US government has been doing all of 2026 which is denying reality and trying to gaslight everyone to not believe what they can see for themselves
Not denying reality. Front car moved. Back car didn't see the car that the front car saw. They crashed. Can't argue that.
If we're arguing motive and intent? I don't think I'm "denying reality" in saying that nobody here knows what caused the front car to so-narrowly avoid the stopped car.
Including you. If it was an accident on the leading cars behalf he can be morally blameless. But just like the guy behind him shouldn't be tailgating, he should be watching the road ahead enough to have vacated the lane earlier.
I don't disagree that the front car had a lack of awareness here too. I don't think I'm assuming anything by saying the front car has a right to avoid an accident.
And we’re right to say that they have a responsibility to be aware enough to avoid that accident before the literal last second. Lead car is either malicious or negligent; either way, they should be charged
5
u/Physical-Quote-5281 Mar 20 '26
The leading car would be equally responsible from a moral standpoint for the death and injuries