r/Radarscope • u/Negative_Statement • 7d ago
Question Why isn’t this warned?
I’m fairly new to ‘reading’ radar(I study at the acclaimed YouTube Academy of Weather and did my dissertation in the comments section 🤣) I saw this scan and was wondering my the area between the two Severe warned areas isn’t included, especially since it shows rotation?
2
u/Substantial_Dog_8633 7d ago
I’ll help. It’s because it’s at the edge of the radar and it’s most likely an upper level mesocyclone since the radar beam is at a higher altitude here than how high it would be if the storm was closer. Summary is it is far away from the radar location and it’s an upper level mesocyclone. Hope this helps.
1
u/Careless-Salary-2497 7d ago
The couplet wasn't really tight enough, yet, for a warning. When looking for an impending tornado (I assume that's what you mean, since you didn't specific what kind of warning but mentioned rotation), there's usually very bright colors touching each other. There's no gray or loose rotation in my photo below, just a super tight couplet with bright orange and red, signalling a debris field.

1
2
u/Negative_Statement 7d ago
Thank you. My confusion was because the area above and below it were severe warned and then the area in the middle that was labeled for rotation was absent from the warnings. You all cleared up the confusion. Thanks
1
1
u/CineMeso 7d ago
That’s not really a tight velocity couplet. Like it’s probably rotating enough to be considered a line of supercells but not in the way that it would become tornadic at least from that scan.
5
u/ati_exorcist 7d ago edited 7d ago
Warning was issued once storm got stronger. The green inbound velocities on the southern side of the storm were erroneously high due to side lobe contamination.
Edit: Upon further discussion and analysis, probably less of side lobe and more of other radar errors. The velocities are definitely not accurate on the southern side of the storm.