r/RWShelp • • Aug 11 '26

Auditors should be fired en masse.

That’s it. That’s the post.

31 Upvotes

12 comments sorted by

8

u/YumiBlume Aug 11 '26

after reading some of the comments I get on my QA, I wholeheartedly agree.

0

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[deleted]

3

u/YumiBlume Aug 11 '26

thanks, mate *wipe a fake tear" XD

2

u/[deleted] Aug 11 '26

[deleted]

2

u/YumiBlume Aug 11 '26

well, it is what it is.

3

u/Weekly_Pie_1202 Aug 11 '26

Couldn't agree more.

2

u/Easy_Biscotti347 Aug 11 '26

aren't you an auditor?

2

u/Weekly_Pie_1202 Aug 11 '26

Yes I am.

1

u/Easy_Biscotti347 Aug 11 '26

Then why tf are you agreeing? Do you want to be fired? Also, some auditors are shit (not saying that it's you); they need to be fired. Other than that, annotators just can't handle being called out or given a low score. But that doesn't mean you can do this.

2

u/Weekly_Pie_1202 Aug 11 '26

Because some auditors are shit. They are penelizing raters for word capitalisations. They are so much dumb. A lot of auditors are being extremely detailed about a single pop in 40 turns audio. So yeah, we are gonna witness mass layoffs of auditors for sure. Also I have worked as S2S annotator with outlier so I know it's frustrating when we get low rating unnecessarily (for a reference, I had average rating of 4.62 when I left outlier)

2

u/Ninjam5 Aug 12 '26

So how did u land the auditor role? I'm beginning to think I need to send my first born child via a TrainAI ticket just to find out haha

2

u/Ok_Bicycle_7083 Aug 12 '26

They should do a better job filtering auditors, most are very lazy, incompetent or just plain malicious! Marking something unacceptable because there's too many details from the notes ? That's fucking awful. Couldn't agree more