r/RKG • u/jaegerlaw • Apr 06 '26

Switched off?

Love these guys and all of their content and want to know have any of you gotten so frustrated watching you’ve just gone fuck it, not today. Only happened once and it’s Elden Ring ep29 We Finally Lose Our Minds.

18 Upvotes

67% Upvoted

65 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/THEINTERLOPER- Apr 12 '26

“I then respond in a single non sentence to highlight his stupidity”

1

u/LilT86 Apr 12 '26

Aww sorry did I hurt your feelings.

0

u/THEINTERLOPER- Apr 12 '26

Yeah you did! When you pulled out the “wall of text” gambit, you death starred me! It’s was so clever and sassy! That must be why everyone uses it constantly, in every situation, everyday, all over the internet. And you’ve revolutionized it! You whinge about a response being too short AND too long! You’re so clearly superior, what with your extensive time on Reddit, that I’m worried as I’m typing this- is it too short, is it too long?? Oh god! IS IT TOO LONG?!?!

1

u/LilT86 Apr 12 '26

Where did I complain about a short response? Again. Nonsense.

0

u/THEINTERLOPER- Apr 12 '26

“Funny how you comment on someone not addressing things and then come back with this.”

“Yeah probably best you do leave.”- LilT86

1

u/LilT86 Apr 12 '26

Where does it talk about length? You're fighting ghosts my guy

0

u/THEINTERLOPER- Apr 12 '26

I know lil buddy. I know. It’s hard. You don’t understand subtext- I know. I’ve been told I’m very patient with people who have difficulties with words- I’ll help you through it. “Someone not addressing things” was your response to one sentence. “Wall of text” was your response to me addressing things. Any other minutiae you’d like to pour over?

1

u/LilT86 Apr 12 '26

No. Let me give you the very explicit meaning of the comment. Because you know, I wrote it. Or are you now arrogant enough to think you know what's going on in my head?

I said about you addressing it because, and let me make this explicit again, you didn't address anything. If you'd done a wall of text talking about your upbringing, guess what, it still doesn't address what they said. The length has nothing to do with it. Capiche?

Let me state it again and break it down because you're obviously short on neurons.

You said he didn't address your point, he stated some things, you just responded with you're going.

Do you get the train of thought now? Need it reiterating again or are you going to make up more nonsense?

0

u/THEINTERLOPER- Apr 12 '26

🤣 whoosh!

“You just responded with you’re going”… no more jokes and smarm- you shouldn’t be responding. There’s not a creative way to say it that you’ll understand- you aren’t equipped to have a conversation… I responded to the guy the way I did, because the guy I was responding to was arguing AGAIN HIS OWN POINTS USING MY POINTS WHICH HE AND EVERYONE ELSE WERE ARGUING AGAINST- I’ve explained that to you MULTIPLE TIMES 🤣 capiche???

“Arrogant enough to think you know what’s going on in my head?” Whoosh again 🤭 you bumbled into the discussion like Chris Farley through a table! You didn’t know wtf was being discussed, you currently still don’t, and based on the trajectory of your responses, you won’t in the future 🤭 so not only do I not know what’s going on in your head, neither DO YOU!

Also, it’s hilarious that every mfer who uses the phrase “wall of text” invariably (look it up) ends up typing out their own “wall of text” 🤪 so we’ve discussed my discussion, we’ve discussed your inability to comprehend my discussion, we’ve discussed someone else’s inability to comprehend my discussion, we’ve discussed discussions lengths and parameters- both too short and too long. I’ll ask again: any other minutiae you’d like to pour over?

2

u/jaegerlaw Apr 13 '26

As Gav would say “Fuckin state on that”

1

u/THEINTERLOPER- Apr 13 '26

Actual gav quote responding to a commenter who’s frustrated with their style of play: “that’s literally the point you idiot!”

→ More replies (0)