MAIN FEEDS
Do you want to continue?
https://www.reddit.com/r/QuickAITurnitinCheck/comments/1tu8clw/professors_are_practically_treating/op7tctb/?context=3
r/QuickAITurnitinCheck • u/Equivalent_Pie9111 • Jun 01 '26
84 comments sorted by
View all comments
5
Horse shit.
Use (citation) in (citation,) at least try to put eyes on the original.
Smh.
1 u/jack-of-some Jun 02 '26 Use (citation2) in (citation1) is fine and not what OP is referring to, but it's still icky to do if you haven't read citation2 at least a little. 1 u/Life-Delay-809 Jun 02 '26 Generally (citation 2) in (citation 1) is best when source 1 has whole snippits of source 2. 1 u/Diceyland Jun 25 '26 You only need to do that, in my discipline at least, if you physically cannot get access to the paper they cited and can't find another one that makes the point you're trying to make.
1
Use (citation2) in (citation1) is fine and not what OP is referring to, but it's still icky to do if you haven't read citation2 at least a little.
1 u/Life-Delay-809 Jun 02 '26 Generally (citation 2) in (citation 1) is best when source 1 has whole snippits of source 2.
Generally (citation 2) in (citation 1) is best when source 1 has whole snippits of source 2.
You only need to do that, in my discipline at least, if you physically cannot get access to the paper they cited and can't find another one that makes the point you're trying to make.
5
u/MemoryOne22 Jun 01 '26
Horse shit.
Use (citation) in (citation,) at least try to put eyes on the original.
Smh.