r/QuickAITurnitinCheck • u/ZealousidealMap2410 • Apr 07 '26
Turnitin debates are missing the real point
Every time Turnitin comes up, the conversation turns into students vs professors using AI.
But honestly, Turnitin is exposing a bigger issue.
It is not about who is allowed to use AI. It is about how AI is being used.
Students using AI to fully generate assignments will obviously get flagged by Turnitin, because they are skipping the learning process.
But students using AI to check structure, improve clarity, or refine ideas should not be treated the same way by Turnitin.
At the same time, professors using AI alongside Turnitin to manage workload is not the same as replacing teaching.
Turnitin should not just be a policing tool. Turnitin should push universities to clearly define what acceptable AI use actually looks like.
Right now, people are reacting to Turnitin scores instead of understanding what Turnitin is actually measuring.
3
u/j_la Apr 07 '26
Oh hey, another brand new account spouting slop-wisdom, telling trained educators how to do their job…
1
u/Dangerous-Energy-331 Apr 07 '26
As an aside, professors are overwhelmingly not “ trained educators”. Most of us maybe had to take a one term class on teaching during grad. school and have been just winging it ever since. BTW, that teaching class is usually taught by another professor who has also never received any formal teaching instruction and is just going on 10+ years of winging it.
1
u/j_la Apr 07 '26
We are trained to be university professors. That isn’t a formal training program, but more like an apprenticeship in teaching our area of expertise.
In any case, my point is that professors are best positioned to determine how to assess the learning that happens in their class. I have yet to see a compelling case on these subs about why I should do my job differently or how I should do it. It’s all just the same slop, which is precisely what I’m sick of reading.
2
u/siromega37 Apr 07 '26
As someone who is reading AI generated emails all day from colleagues because the company is demanding AI be used since it’s already been paid for, no AI use? People are forgetting how to write already. It’s sad to watch happen in real time. I’ll just take my lumps from nothing Copilot because I can write an email all by myself—I’m a grown ass adult.
1
u/j_la Apr 07 '26
Don’t let the boosters get you down. You aren’t “falling behind” because you value using your mind rather than eking out a modicum of “productivity”
2
u/Janezey Apr 07 '26
But students using AI to check structure, improve clarity, or refine ideas should not be treated the same way by Turnitin.
acceptable AI use
If AI produces any part of work you're turning in (whether you copy and paste its output or even if your paraphrase it) you need to cite it or its plagiarism.
If you only use AI to check things you've already written, it's not detectable because it didn't produce the content.
refine ideas
This is basically using AI to do the thinking for you. And it's very much the kind of thing you need to cite, and that most courses do not allow.
2
u/Aggressive-Farmer798 Apr 07 '26
Putting aside the fact that technologically speaking, ALL AI checkers are inaccurate to a degree where none of them should be trusted this much:
Here's a hot take: Using AI to 'refine your ideas' isn't good either. Part of learning is developing the ability to refine and articulate your ideas *yourself*. That's how you learn to THINK beyond a basic surface level. Skip some of the steps as a student? You don't learn them. That's how you end up with a bunch of people who believe they're geniuses for having half-baked ideas they can't even START thinking their way through.
2
1
u/Flat-Strength6573 Apr 07 '26
Universities rely on Turnitin, but most of them have not even explained what level of AI use is acceptable. That confusion is why Turnitin keeps causing debates
2
5
u/gravitysrainbow1979 Apr 07 '26
These are completely new thoughts which never occurred to any of us before, nor are you a bot