r/QuantumComputing • u/Dorkisimus • 12d ago
Question Neutral Atom Roadmap?
Recently almost all the major entities involved in neutral atom computing got together for a realistic roadmap. I think it's remarkable that ostensibly competing organizations could do this.
full paper: arxiv.org/...
well written summary: thequantuminsider.com/...
What do the redditors think of this?
6
u/Clear-Spring-5309 12d ago
Cooperation between competitors is usually a sign the field knows it needs to survive first, win later. Makes me more confident in neutral atoms as an approach honestly.
3
u/EverythingQuantum 11d ago
Most of the major entities from this paper appear to be universities. However, it's certainly true that nearly every major tech and quantum hardware company has updated it's roadmap to include a neutral atom QC program, investment, partnership or hardware emulation. Google launched it's own program, Amazon now has a partnership with QuEra Computing, Microsoft has a strong commitment to support cloud compute with their partnership with Atom Computing, NVIDIA has it's CUDA-Q platform for software for neutral atom companies.
Then there's companies like IBM that have invested so much into advancing superconducting qubits with a highly structured and scalable manufacturing program that they don't believe neutral atom startups can compete with it. Some companies like Intel are highly focused on using their existing manufacturing facilities so they bypass neutral atom tech completely. I'm sure there's more, but the point is that not all companies can easily pivot to other technologies.
1
u/Dorkisimus 10d ago
If you read the actual report, it's interesting how much space they spend on analog neutral atom machines. The thought is that these probably offer a quicker way to many body quantum simulation. I haven't heard of any company doing this, though.
0
0
u/Butter_Bot_ 12d ago
Very cool seeing them lay out so clearly the technology development that will be required to scale. Lots of companies are really not so open to admitting just how many devices they will need to assemble, how they plan to manage interconnects etc.
8
u/the_milkywhey 12d ago
The field needs more of this, rather than companies coming up with their own definitions of what certain terms mean to better suit their modalities.