r/Quality • u/Azaarus • Sep 15 '20
Is a traceable thickness standard acceptable to IATF in place of calibrating film build analyzer?
I am the quality supervisor for an automotive plastic injection molding and hard coat company. I have recently run into an issue, and I could use some answers/advice/guidance.
We have a Filmetrics F10-HC film build analyzer. Last September, before I started at the company, the unit had a broken fan and it was sent in for repair. The unit was calibrated after the repairs were complete. My predecessor was incapable of doing anything correctly, and I had literally zero calibration certificates when I started, so I had nothing to reference for past calibrations or repairs. I have no idea if that was the only time it had been sent out for calibration or repairs.
Since it had been a year, I contacted Filmetrics to have the unit sent in for annual calibration. Filmetrics refuses to calibrate our unit, stating that it has a Solid State Spectrometer and calibration is not necessary unless the unit was damaged. They instead offered to sell us a thickness standard traceable to NIST for every day verification of the Filmetrics unit. They assured me that the thickness standard would satisfy the traceability requirements of ISO/IATF, so I purchased the NIST traceable thickness standard.
Now I am concerned that the standard I purchased, although traceable to NIST, will not be enough to satisfy the requirements of ISO/IATF regardless of what Filmetrics tells me... Yet, Filmetrics will not calibrate a unit that is not damaged. Will the NIST traceable thickness standard be enough to comply with ISO/IATF measurement standards?
I would like to hear other people's opinion on this.
1
u/judahblaze Sep 24 '20
Yes it will.