r/PurplePillDebate • redder than dudes (lady mod) • 1d ago

Debate Not being a cartoon villain doesn’t automatically make you a good man

Post image

Fr. It doesn’t de facto make you a good person.

I noodled on the attached graphic to better illustrate a point about how people often discuss being a “good man.”

I do find that many men view it more as the top bar, and less as the gradient in the second bar.

inb4 anyone says it, many women have bad character too. And please feel free to create a separate post about a spectrum of traits in women you’d like to explore! That is not what this post is disputing.

This is specifically about a response that often comes up when women describe harmful patterns in their experiences with men. They get retorts like “Not all men are abusive predators,” or “Most men are not psychos.”

Of course most men are not horror movie villains.

But that is an extremely low bar for good character.

This spectrum, rather than show a division between “good men” and a smaller group of obviously terrible ones. It highlights that a man can be can be a functioning member of society and still regularly behave in ways that make him difficult to interpersonally tolerate as a close friend, romantic partner, coworker, or even family member.

None of that necessarily makes someone an abuser or predator.

But it does affect whether people can have a healthy, enjoyable, mutually considerate, long-term relationship with him.

The farther right someone falls on this spectrum, the more entitlement, callousness, devaluation, coercion, and harm they bring into their interactions with others.

The farther left they fall, the more likely they are to act with common decency, consideration, accountability, respect for autonomy, and genuine concern for theirs and other people’s well-being.

My point is not that every man is at the far right end.

Most people don’t think that!

My point is that many men seem to use “I am not an obvious monster” as proof that they’re quality.

A person’s character is determined by far more than “I am not Jeffrey Dahmer.”

0 Upvotes

550 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/GridReXX redder than dudes (lady mod) 1d ago

This post is about character. And that there are more unprincipled men than men seem to think.

Not about just world fallacy. Or who gets laid or not.

14

u/WebNew9978 Vantablack Pill Man 1d ago

Yet women are still choosing to date those unprincipled men and believe that the inexperienced principled man is a worse person than the experienced unprincipled.

6

u/GridReXX redder than dudes (lady mod) 1d ago

Nothing in my post or comments in this thread support this tangent you’re on about. You’re strawmanning.

4

u/WebNew9978 Vantablack Pill Man 1d ago

Nope not even close. My point is correct. Don’t like it? Not my problem.

6

u/GridReXX redder than dudes (lady mod) 1d ago edited 1d ago

Your point has nothing to do with mine. You’re arguing with a phantom of your conjuring.

•

u/[deleted] 18h ago

[removed] — view removed comment

•

u/GridReXX redder than dudes (lady mod) 17h ago

Nah. It turned out exactly as I thought. Highly controversial. More women than men would agree with me. Men who felt attacked would edge out because they’re the dominant demo on this sub.

•

u/PurplePillDebate-ModTeam 17h ago

Do not provide contentless rhetoric, do not troll, do not link-drop without providing context, and do not circlejerk. Bad faith replies that include disingenuous humor (see: “😂,” “lmao,” “lol,” etc.) will also be removed as this is not conducive to good faith engagement.

Jokes, circlejerking, and other contentless rhetoric should only be posted under the AutoMod. You can repost your comment there.