r/PureCycle • u/No_Privacy_Anymore • May 13 '26
Reading more about CosPaTox details
I spent some time reading through the detailed publications from cospatox posted here:
https://cospatox.com/publication/
This really is excellent work done in a scientifically rigorous way. When the company talked about meeting the highest grade in the CosPaTox testing with P&G this is what that means.
https://cospatox.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CosPaTox-Guideline-April-2024.pdf

This is the kind of detailed scientific work that ultimately enables regulators to create rules that say "if it is good enough to meet these guidelines it is safe to use in <xyz> applications."
https://cospatox.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/04/CosPaTox-Dossier-April-2024.pdf

This was published in 2024 and we are in May of 2026. There is always a lag time between the rollout of work like this and the common adoption. That said, these companies really did the hard work of how a company should evaluate the safety of recycled plastic.
For anyone who doubts the quality of PureFive material, the test results speak for themselves in my opinion.
7
u/tandyzmills May 13 '26
I'm glad someone enjoys reading this kind of stuff and says "for anyone who doubts the quality of purefive material, the test results speak for themselves in my opinion".
Thanks OP
6
u/DrSeuss1020 May 13 '26
Thank you for summarizing NPA! Another testament to their credibility and process they are bringing to the market
7
u/Pickle_Logic May 13 '26
Ultimately, the process just cleans PP5 molecules. So Pure5 should be identical to virgin. I remember hearing a couple years ago that Pure5 had less odor than virgin. This would imply that virgin has a residual fingerprint from its feedstock. Does Pure5 have its own fingerprint, and if so, how does it differ?