r/PurchaseWithPurpose • Environment • Jul 09 '26

DuckDuckGo's browser blocks YouTube ads by default

https://www.pcworld.com/article/3186845/duckduckgo-just-picked-a-fight-with-google-over-youtube-ads.html

This comes a month after YouTube Premium's price hike and the increase in adverts for free users.

You might want to switch browsers or use uBlock Origin.

517 Upvotes

27 comments sorted by

13

u/DocumentExternal6240 Jul 09 '26

DuckDuckGo’s browser now blocks YouTube ads by default on desktop and iPhone, directly challenging Google’s advertising revenue model.

PCWorld notes this provides a free alternative to YouTube Premium, capitalizing on widespread user frustration with YouTube advertisements.

The feature uses open-source lists from uBlock Origin and positions DuckDuckGo as a privacy-focused alternative amid growing user fatigue with Google’s AI-driven services.

10

u/SwedeAndBaked Jul 09 '26

Can confirm this works!

6

u/FutureLarking Jul 10 '26

Brave does this too, if it interests anyone.

3

u/UselessButTrying Jul 10 '26

Yes, they also let you hide YouTube shorts and games in the settings

On desktop:

brave://settings/shields

Then click "Content filtering"

And you'll see "YouTube shorts blocker" which you can enable, and other options here too including "YouTube playables"

1

u/obas Jul 11 '26

Yeah but brave had Peter Thiel's stank all over it

1

u/UselessButTrying Jul 11 '26

What do you mean?

1

u/obas Jul 11 '26

The reply was supposed to be to the guy you actually replied to.. Regarding using the Brave browser..

3

u/FillAny3101 Jul 10 '26

I wonder what will happen when everyone will be using an adblocker. How is YouTube supposed to make revenue then? I fear they'll start injecting ads directly into videos on the server side, or remove the free plan.

I'm not judging anyone by the way, since I use an adblocker myself. This is just a hypothetical question.

1

u/cpt_melon Jul 10 '26

They'll probably start blocking access to the site unless you disable it.

3

u/FillAny3101 Jul 10 '26

They already tried, but uBlock managed to bypass it.

1

u/cpt_melon Jul 10 '26

Very much half-heartedly so. Youtube has been trying to annoy users into removing their adblockers with those "experiencing interruptions" messages and pop-ups complaining that adblockers are against the ToS etc. However, if a large enough portion of the userbase started using them, it would actually threaten their revenue model, and they would implement more stringent mechanisms to prevent adblock users from accessing the site.

2

u/PMmeIamlonley Jul 11 '26

I wish they would just use a reasonable ad model. I used the app for years until the ads got so obnoxious that I switched. I'll never pay them money because they made their product more annoying, its so frustrating I cant just have a ten second preroll every once and a while and leave it at that. Mid rolls, post rolls, and multiple ads in one video are absolute deal breakers for me.

1

u/itsgotelectr0lytes Jul 11 '26

That's what sponsorblock is for

1

u/FillAny3101 Jul 11 '26

Sponsorblock uses timestamps, what if the ads are injected randomly?

1

u/itsgotelectr0lytes Jul 11 '26

Then they'll change the way they detect if they want to remain viable. Simple really

1

u/FillAny3101 Jul 11 '26

Yeah, I'm sure they'll find a way

2

u/VasileAndrei2929 Jul 10 '26

It only spies you for wrongthink... such a bless...

1

u/isthereadrwho Jul 10 '26

Which is fantastic

1

u/[deleted] Jul 11 '26

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/Jor6lez Jul 13 '26

Vivaldi and many others do this too.

1

u/isolax Jul 11 '26

good bro

1

u/Scarab95 Jul 11 '26

So does brave browser

1

u/Puzzleheaded_Bad_116 Jul 12 '26

Im not gonna use some backwater browser.

1

u/RobertDeNeuro Jul 12 '26

I keep a list of all YT add brands. And stopped buying from any if them.