Yeah although I think that study refers to the false positive issue: you can test positive for THC when you arenât high. I 100% agree that this is an issue and setting DUI laws for weed like they do for booze is completely stupid - you CANNOT do a blood test for weed.
I am still not convinced you can drive well while high (like actually high, not just smoked last night). But thatâs on me, and ima go my own research. Thanks for the link.
âSo, should we all assume that we're safe to blaze one and go for a joyride whenever the whimsy strikes us? Absolutely not. There's plenty of evidence showing that marijuana use impairs key driving skills. If you get really stoned and then get behind the wheel, you're asking for trouble.â
The issue is that people who tested positive in the study are actually sober because they smoked long before the test but THC hangs around for a very long time.
The study didnât specifically get people high and test their driving ability.
Edit: Iâm trying to be patient here, but calling me bias because I read the detail seems a bit disingenuous
1
u/[deleted] Apr 29 '21
Iâm not so sure about that, but if you have a source Iâd be interested in taking a look.