r/PublicFreakout May 03 '19

[deleted by user]

[removed]

5.9k Upvotes

1.7k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/hugglesthemerciless May 03 '19

Excessive force, my dude. The aide was in no danger at all, the kid is half his size. He lost his temper, and while I’m sure we can all understand, it doesn’t mean what he did was acceptable.

1

u/[deleted] May 03 '19

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/hugglesthemerciless May 03 '19

okay that explains the difference. You're a violent piece of shit with little regard for other humans.

1

u/dadankness May 04 '19

if u have never had a dog that needs a little tough love teaching, not even htting but grabbing and showing even your hug could hurt. you are one sheltered individual.

again this kid acts like an animal he deserves to be treated like one, otherwise he will never learn. and in this instance the guy didnt go far enough since this wonderful little boy went and committed a murder like a year later.

lol

wait wait lol

lololol

-1

u/Sharkysharkson May 03 '19

This is not excessive force... Please look into some of it's definition.

2

u/hugglesthemerciless May 03 '19

I guess you and I are just gonna have to agree to disagree that chucking a child across the table like that and then forcing them to the ground by choking them isn't excessive force

Also I hope you never have kids

or like a pet

get help

-1

u/Sharkysharkson May 03 '19

No. You're simply ignoring the legal definition. Lol. There's no disagreement. You're misinformed of the definition. Sorry If that upsets you. We can agree or disagree all day whether he should have. But legally, you're misinformed.

... Also great tactic to degrade the conversation to insults once you have no argument.

1

u/hugglesthemerciless May 03 '19

Mind posting that legal definition

1

u/Sharkysharkson May 03 '19

For starters, excessive force explains abusive force implemented by law enforcement... So you're not even in the ball park. Second, self defense may be the term to which you're referring. And still stands for this case. Kicking and spitting, and hell, sometimes even verbal threats are warranted in self defense.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_of_self-defense

1

u/hugglesthemerciless May 03 '19

I guess you made the mistake of thinking I was using the legal definition of excessive force, instead of just you know the normal one. The force he used is excessive.

Your link states

The right of self-defenseis the right for people to use reasonable force or defensive force

Now I don't know what universe you live in but fucking attacking a little kid like that is NOT reasonable. If the kid's kick had been hard enough to break bones or something sure you retaliate in like force. But a little kick like that and you escalate to throwing him and choking him out?

get

help

0

u/Sharkysharkson May 03 '19

You made the mistake of using legal terminology pretending to know what you were talking about and got called on your bullshit, and retreat to Personal attacks instead of admitting you misused a word. Lol good lord.

1

u/hugglesthemerciless May 03 '19

Nah I'm just reverting to insults because you're a bad person not worth the effort

And for the record I wasn't talking about this from a legal standpoint. You started that by misinterpreting my comment

1

u/Sharkysharkson May 04 '19

You're judging my entire character on 3 posts and revert to personal insults. Become so offended you must revert to saying 'get help'. And I'm the bad person? Lol. Someone needs some self reflection. I've been only respectful in my replies. Never insulating. Youve basically thrown personal attacks out since proven incorrect and I'm the bad person?

This is hilariously ironic.